gamerprinter
Mapper/Publisher
Why Paizo had to metagame the rogue to SA undead and constructs? Perhaps to avoid nerfing rogues in campaigns heavy with undead and constructs - there's lots out there. Since 3.5 only targetted those with knowledge of anatomical areas, the confusion arises as to how this works in Pathfinder.
Its not written anywhere, except on the Paizo boards somewhere, a quadrupel construct or an animated skeleton have hip joints, knees, actuator pivots - if you can get your dagger in there on flanking shot you could bring the sucker down. Its less about piercing a non-existent heart, than causing extra damage for targeting an identified weakness in any opponent. So for PF anyway, its no longer about anatomy, unless your target is alive.
You can always house rule it back the old way, it shouldn't hurt your Pathfinder game.
GP
Its not written anywhere, except on the Paizo boards somewhere, a quadrupel construct or an animated skeleton have hip joints, knees, actuator pivots - if you can get your dagger in there on flanking shot you could bring the sucker down. Its less about piercing a non-existent heart, than causing extra damage for targeting an identified weakness in any opponent. So for PF anyway, its no longer about anatomy, unless your target is alive.
You can always house rule it back the old way, it shouldn't hurt your Pathfinder game.
GP
Last edited: