DiasExMachina 4ED Update

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Our 3.5 Version of Amethyst listed nine playtesters. The 4th Edition boasts around 50. It just goes to show that if it's worth doing, it's worth doing well. So I want to take a moment and credit those playtesters which gave their time to ensure a high quality product...


Michael Andaluz
Charla Anderson
Daryl Anderson
Miquel Creus Bassas
Pamela Bennett
Trevor Bennett
Jeff Berndt
Gary Bratzel
Eric Braun
Chris Brown
Greg Brown
Jason Brown
Jordi Martin Castany
Andrew Cermak
Schuyler Den Dulk
Chris Dias
Pere Rodriguez Franch
Jordi Franch Ventura
Marc Franch Ventura
Glen Gratton
Aaron Hengst
R William Herschler
David Hoyer
Jennifer Hoyer
Steve Hoyer
Christopher Hunt
Ian Hunt
Jordi Sala Ibars
Geoffrey Lamb
Tiffany Lamb
Edward William Martin
Paul Johnson
Cameron Lauder
Robert Mann
Alan Mills
Mike McMullen
Michael Murphy
Jon Ohman
Jewel Sandeen
Kiara Sandeen
Sean Sandeen
Brad Scoble
Marc Sonnenberger
Clarence Sterling
Tim Sullivan
Sean Thompson
Chris Tyler
Ivolytch Tzulusky
Marina Ursa
Phil Vecchione
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Got something cool to share... The final cover of Amethyst--what to look for on the shelves when it comes out...

GMG4370CoverLarge.jpg
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
I wanted to discuss something I posted on another thread on RPGNet...there has been a lot of discussion on the possibilities of gamers creating their own original setting utilizing our rules. Turns out this is easier than it appears. As a result, I am going to attempt to include a new section in the new book detailing on how to do that. Here are the highlights of what I am thinking...

If you wish to keep the technology relatively low, you can choose to either create higher enhancement levels for low tech items or bestow free enhancements, thus removing the need to always acquire higher level weapons. Realistically, this only works if you allow magical firearms in your setting (see later for details).

Otherwise, it makes more sense to allow players to retain their original level 1 weapons and offer free enhancements to coincide with the character's capacity to use the weapon better (the gun isn't magically getting better, just the character's skill with it).

Armor works the same way. You can permit magical technology or bestow enhancement based on character level as said character gains more experience. You must however, consider financial rewards when employing automatic enhancement. Players would not require as much money because they wouldn't need to upgrade their weapons and armor.

Employing powerful weapons like plasma throwers and rail cannons (all Tech Levels higher than 0), require you to scale back their enhancements if introducing them at first level. Not only do weapons like railcannons begin at enhancement +4, they also feature abilities which may throw the balance of power if employed by a first level character. There are several solutions when wishing to use high tech weapons in a low-level game.

The first deals with simply rebranding low tech weapons. Perhaps all weapons are energy weapons and the high tech varieties are simply much more powerful versions of these smaller designs. If you want to remove the need for characters to purchase weapons repeatedly throughout their lives (like mentioned above with low tech games), you could use the same system above with one additional rule dealing with when the character acquires the weapon's special feature.

The only character class to be affected with a homebrew game is the Operator. This is an easy fix as a player just needs to avoid selecting any class powers which mention or deal with disruption.

Allowing fantasy classes to utilize technology is also a simple proposition. Depending on your setting, you may permit certain classes to have proficiencies in firearms. The general rule being that if a class has a proficiency only in simple ranged weapons, they may also have a proficiency in one-handed small arms. Those classes proficient in military ranged weapons may also have proficiencies in both one-handed and two-handed small arms. Heavy weapons may be a more difficult notion to explain away without the player selecting the proficiency feat later on. As a result, it is quiet easy to allow a Ranger to employ both one-handed and two-handed firearms with all of her ranged attack powers. Similarly, a useful rule could also be implemented to allow the Rogue the capacity to assume that all one-handed small arms also count as a hand crossbow (for the purposes of sneak attack and powers). This later rule can be employed in canon Amethyst as well for a techan character wanting more stealth and close-quarters assassination over the Stalker class.

Similarly, there is nothing to stop your custom game from throwing out the disruption rules with magical races and creating a techan group populated by orcs, elves, and dwarves.
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Amethyst is now available through Alliance distribution. Which means your FLGS (Friendly Local Game Store) can no order it in. So if I ever asked anything from anyone, now is the time. Call or go down to your FLGS and ask that they carry Amethyst.

The Product Number is GMG4370
Amethyst through Goodman Games
 


Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
I think I talk too much. Todd from Emerald Press doesn't think so. He interviewed me on CALive a few weeks ago and it finally got posted this week. The link follows. Maybe I just don't like the sound of my own voice. :)

We talk about the history of Amethyst and upcoming April release, mention NeuroSpasta briefly and dive into why players (at least mine) appear predisposed to create characters that beget the end of days. Maybe it's just my players that find satisfaction in the creation the antichrist...


Home - Emerald Press PDF Publishing
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
One of the complaints I am actually looking forward to fielding involves the usage of ammunition. Last session, my rogue activated a close burst ranged ability involving thrown daggers but hadn’t accounted for the number of daggers required to fulfill the power. He was trying to make the argument that ammunition usage is not covered in the rules. You use the power and disregard the specifics. He was joking. I wasn’t laughing.

The idea of one bullet per attack roll seems pretty basic—following the same logic of one arrow per attack roll for the ranger or rogue. But where the ranger only fires one arrow at a time (mostly at least), a stalker or a grounder have the capacity of firing multiple weapons multiple times. I asked both my group and my playtesters if our ammunition usage was too strict. The unanimous response was “no”. You can increase damage with Akimbo, a feat which uses the same ammunition in your secondary hand as your primary hand. You can do likewise with the Burst Fire feat, which increases rate of fire to 5 shots per attack roll with autofire weapons instead of 1. If you are wielding machine pistols, these values stack. However, as clearly seen, you just went from using 1 shot per attack roll to 10 shots per attack roll. Despite what you might think, I discovered to my amazement, that players were willingly using this additional ammunition for a very mild increase in damage.

Then comes Passing Kill. Passing Kill is a Minor action power which causes 1 point of damage. Add in Akimbo and Rapid Fire, and it increases to an impressive 3 points of damage. So…10 shots = 3 points of damage for a minor action power. Take into account your standard attack power and you can see where ammunition usage can go out of control. Players may bit--…complain that ammunition usage is too high, that it’s not worth the extra ammo. Well here is the response: You don’t have to do it. If you are down to your last few clips, don’t use the extra ammo. Conserve. From playing first-person-shooters, the idea of conservation may seem foreign, especially in an environment where players can just pick up randomly fallen clips as they venture through a hostile landscape. In the real world, this doesn’t occur, especially in the fantasy landscape of Amethyst, where you have only what you take with you.

So three weeks ago, I started my THIRD Amethyst campaign, dubbed “Cradle” (long story). We’ve been running these games since 2002. My co-writer and friend, Conan, selected a two-pistol Stalker build and was impressed in himself with his 270 rounds of ammunition (9 clips worth for his dual machine pistols) he acquired at 1st level. With both Akimbo and Burst Fire, he had the capacity to rain some impressive damage upon his foes. He was also confident his supply would carry for the duration of the dungeon module I was starting them on.

He employed Passing Kill and Boundary Threshold on a regular basis and after the VERY FIRST battle against a group of Boggs, Conan was slack-jawed at his ammunition usage. He had used 40 rounds in the first battle. 14% of his entire supply gone on the opening encounter. With no capacity to reload until they get back to a town, Conan realized that Passing Kill’s balance is the severe ammunition usage for the promise of a mild increase in the damage he inflicts in a turn. Ammo is quite cheap but not free. He also has a limit on how much he can carry.

We are now into our third session in this dungeon and the module is just hitting the half way point. Conan will be surely out of bullets by the end current battle. Player pressure has prevented him from avoiding the use of Passing Kill. When I informed him a certain enemy had only 3 hit points left, instead of letting one of the other three players (all of whom went before the monster) make the killing blow/shot, Conan activated Passing Kill, fired 10 shots of ammunition, did 3 points of damage, and claimed the kill as his own…because he’s a player…and he’s stupid. This didn’t occur once. It happened numerous times throughout the day.

Point is ammunition is part of the balance of Amethyst and our modern rules as a whole. Yes, we have massive powers which can lay huge effects across many enemies. But to do so requires significant ammunition to accomplish. When I considered that ammunition usage may be a bit steep, I looked at the number of bullets spent in an average conflict in our real world…and I realized we were still somewhat frugal.
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Here is something someone asked: What can we take out? Which of our new rules for applying modern technology to 4th Edition can a GM ignore (or alter) without affecting game balance. In truth, there are only a few rules we added, mostly dealing with moving and firing with heavy weapons. We didn’t insert armor penetration or hardness or the resilience of cover (we do that in NeuroSpasta). But if a group believes a certain rule is uninteresting or too complicated, can it be removed without breaking the game?


This topic was discussed at length in the development of the rules. One co-developer insisted that our disruption rules be a game-balancing effect. The rest of us were adamant that this not be the case. As I stated in an earlier post, disruption rules are optional (even in an Amethyst game) and should only be implemented if the group is being irresponsible with their technology in the fantasy world. You can ignore them as you see fit, regardless of which game you are running. Other rules of question include ammunition usage, move and fire penalties with two-handed weapons, and the advanced rules regarding explosives and vehicle combat. Everything else in the book are based on rules already present in the GSL, so removing them is ignoring rules from core D&D (so do so at your peril).


I believe whole heartedly that players keep track of ammunition as its acquisition and management is a key issue of the Amethyst setting. However, this may not be a necessary if you are running a modern setting with these same rules. I still would prefer people track their ammunition as it does force an additional level of skill. If a GM is expected to track the hit points of a dozen monsters, I am certain said GM can ask his/her players to track how many bullets they fire. If you are reenacting the Mogadishu conflict of Black Hawk Dawn, I would still suggest you enforce the tracking of ammunition usage. If you have to do that when playing Fallout 3, you can do it here. It’s simple common sense. Now that being said, if you still insist on claiming this rule as clumsy, you can still ignore it without breaking game balance. The only power I think it would affect would by the aforementioned Passing Kill power available to the Stalker. I could consider amending it to a move action but personally, I wouldn’t bother. So technically, ammunition usage can go.


Move and fire rules are present only to offer realism to those untrained in how to effectively use two-handed and heavy weapons. This is why these move and fire rules are ignored with the grounder class. You can choose to disregard them for all classes, but then the grounder looses a class feature (as it is shared by the whole party now). I would still insist heavy weapon incur an attack penalty when moved. Once again, it’s not game balance. It’s just common sense.


Vehicle Rules are complicated and only present for those wishing to take advantage of it. With these, I figured there were too options: Not make them detailed and offer the opinion we didn’t care or make them detailed and allow you to make the judgment on how you wish to implement them. If you just want a basic skill challenge without the math, please go right ahead.


Explosives may feel complicated but they are actually only there when someone dives into their use. Meaning, if a PC doesn’t take the Demolitions skill and purchase the necessary explosives and detonators, he/she would never encounter the complicated layers of planting explosives.


Finally, I’ll end off with several rules which I DO believe would break game balance if they were ignored. The first and most obvious one deals with firearm damage. Beyond the argument comparing damage outputs of arrows versus firearms (ignoring their damage in comparison to melee weapons), some people still insist that a bullet should do two or three times more damage than a sword. Obviously adjusting these damage values would greatly affect game balance. The same goes for our unique weapons. These are speciality weapons which can only be used with a ranged basic attack. If you choose to overlook this rule and allow their use with an encounter or a daily power, the results would be…well…biblical.


Here is another argument toward using ammunition. Let’s say your character finds a high tech weapon (higher tech = higher enhancement) early on. This can be a plot point or a connection to his or her back-story. I am doing this currently in my Amethyst game. By using ammunition (in this case, an energy cell), you allow that PC a weapon that is impressive and potentially game breaking…until it runs out. I made it perfectly clear to a player that was given a +5 Plasma pistol that once said weapon runs out of shots (he has used about 4 of its 10 charges already); he will not find another power cell until ohhh....about level 20. I also then don’t have to worry about him being near a store which could sell technology that high when he achieves that level.
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Gamers that pre-order Amethyst either through Goodman Games or your friendly local game store will now receive exclusive downloadable content (DLC, commonly seen with modern computer games).:)The DLC package is over 100 MB and includes these awesome bonuses:

--Two adventures including the Hearts of Chaos 2009 FreeRPGDay module
--A user-editable Amethyst character sheet
--Six high-res images suitable for poster printing
--A massive two-page full-color world map
--And last but certainly not least, the entire original 3.5 Edition of the Amethyst RPG which was released in 2008 to glowing reviews

Place your pre-order with your local retailer today!
Offer expires May 1, 2010.
 

Dias Ex Machina

Publisher / Game Designer
Couple interesting tidbits this week.

Lots of good responses from the offer of DLC for those who pre-order. As result, I have expanded the DLC from 120 megs to 150 megs. There is now more artwork and a file containing original fiction set in the Amethyst setting.

I made a few final minor tweaks to the combat engine based on some more additional Biohazard feedback. The book is set and is heading to printers.

Based on that thought, Amethyst is now open for reviews. Anyone wanting to get on the list, should contact me, along with the blog, site, or publication you represent.
 

Remove ads

Top