Scholar & Brutalman
First Post
Voss said:Ah. I didn't realize you were arguing for the sake of being argumentative. 'WotC can do whatever they want because it isn't real' is a circular argument that doesn't lead anywhere.
No. What I am pointing out is that you do not have an argument here. Your opinion is that you don't like things that bear some resemblance to reptiles to have boobs. This is fine - I even agree with it. You can say that because they don't in myth and legend, they shouldn't have them. I don't agree, but that's fine too.
However, you keep pointing at reptiles and saying "No boobs". This is not an argument that proves that dragons shouldn't have them either. Dragons aren't reptiles. No matter how many how many times you compare them, they aren't. They aren't mammals, they aren't birds, they aren't any kind of real animal. They are fictional. WotC can indeed describe dragons in their game however they like - because they aren't real, and because it's their game.
They could make all the monsters Neo-pets or Pokemon if they really wanted to
Absolutely correct. Since dragons are exactly as real as pokemon. D&D is not a zoological project.