Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves Movie Review

To say that the original 2000 Dungeons & Dragons movie was a critical failure is an understatement. By contrast, if the new movie, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves isn't a cinematic natural 20, it's at least a 19.

To say that the original 2000 Dungeons & Dragons movie was a critical failure is an understatement. By contrast, if the new movie, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves isn't a cinematic natural 20, it's at least a 19. PLEASE NOTE: This review contains spoilers!

DnD HAT Poster 2.PNG

Old and New​

The contrast between the two movies isn't just drastic, it also highlights why one succeeds while another failed. Courtney Solomon, producer/director of the 2000 film, used very little recognizable D&D content, chose Izmer as the location, and changed a lot of what it did use. The tone tried to be epic and funny in an unfortunate combination that did neither.

For D&D:HAT, producer/director/writers John Francis Daley and Jonathan Goldstein capture the feeling of a good D&D campaign – adventure, heroics, humor, and enough heart to make you care about what happens to the characters. While firmly grounding movie in Faerun's Sword Coast, it's never heavy handed. Characters don't name every spell or item used unless it's relevant and logical.

Xenk and Edgin.PNG

Set in the Forgotten Realms​

No actual knowledge of D&D or the Forgotten Realms is needed to enjoy the movie, so if you want to bring non-gamers to see it, they'll be just fine.

At the same time, the movie effortlessly establishes how Faerun is different from other fantasy settings like Middle-Earth or Westeros. Aarakocra, dragonborn, and tabaxi are just a few of the species depicted in addition to elves, tieflings, dwarves, etc.

The movie starts in Revel's End in Icewind Dale and soon provides a perfect in-story reason to recap Edgin (Chris Pine) and Holga's (Michelle Rodriguez) back story. This, along with how they met Forge Hugh Grant) and Simon (Justice Smith), are covered in detail in the prequel novel, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves: Road to Neverwinter, but the movie explains everything you need to know if you haven't read the book. Soon, a personal yet epic quest begins to find the objects necessary to right a wrong, stop a plot by the Red Wizards of Thay, and reunite Edgin with his daughter Kira (Chloe Coleman), taking them to Neverwinter, the Underdark, Uthgardt Elk Tribe territory, and more.

And just like most D&D campaigns, plans are made and go astray before the crew improvises a solution. There's even one part that subtly reminds me of players ignoring a DM's plans to go off and do something else.

Simon brings Doric into the team, despite her reservations about humans. In her prequel novel, Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves: Druid's Call, a mysterious, human-led, well-financed group are cutting down a forest. The book's unresolved question of who and why is answered in the movie.

Daley and Goldstein are long-time D&D players, and it shows in how they constructed the story and brought Faerun to life. Yet while the movie mostly follows D&D rules, it does indulge in “the rule of cool” a few times, most notably Doric's ability to wildshape into an owlbear. A reason was provided for it in her prequel novel, but they're really doing it because it does look awesome. In fact, there's one scene where owlbear Doric thwamps a character in a way that might become as popular in pop culture as Hulk's thwamping of Loki.

Doric Simon Edgin Holga.PNG

Why Are They Working Together?​

The trailers raised questions as to why Regé-Jean Page's paladin would be working with a crew of thieves. The movie explains it well, and Page is terrific as Xenk, perfectly establishing how paladins are both useful and annoying. Scenes between Page and Pine also beautifully illustrate how different two Charisma-based characters can be.

I also love how they depict Holga. At a table, barbarians are often played as just brute force fighters. Holga shows how situational awareness, practical ingenuity, and brute force are even more effective combined.

The movie contains both actor and character cameos I won't spoil. Just pay attention to some of the other characters in the games sequence for some of them.

DnD HAT Poster 1.PNG

Should You See It?​

Based on the terrific job they did with the Spider-Man: Homecoming script, I was hopeful that Daley and Goldstein would pull off a good D&D movie. They actually exceeded my expectations. The movie is incredibly fun, and I genuinely laughed out loud at some dialogue. It simultaneously tugged at my heart in places, and in legitimate ways since it had laid the groundwork beforehand.

The movie is a self-contained story that leaves a ton of room for sequels. If one or two can match this, not only will it be a well-established franchise, but could also spin off into other parts of the D&D multiverse.

Stick around for a mid-credit scene that's just perfect in every way.

I can't wait until D&D:HAT is available for purchase. I know there are things in the background that I didn't quite catch. The mix of being an incredibly fun movie with being able to rewind it to catch all the Easter eggs and casual references makes it a must-buy for me.

Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves hits a perfect tone and blend of adventure, heart, and humor. A+
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Beth Rimmels

Beth Rimmels


log in or register to remove this ad


wellis

Explorer
Did the movie ever acknowledge Gary Gygax or did it just say Hasbro & WotC? I've heard claims it did acknowledge Gygax, Arneson, Greenwood, etc but like way at the end of the credits, but I don't know if any of this is actually true or not.
 

MNblockhead

A Title Much Cooler Than Anything on the Old Site
Did the movie ever acknowledge Gary Gygax or did it just say Hasbro & WotC? I've heard claims it did acknowledge Gygax, Arneson, Greenwood, etc but like way at the end of the credits, but I don't know if any of this is actually true or not.
I only remember Hasbro and WotC and that's all I can see IMDb. IMDb doesn't, however, seem to give the full text of the credits.
 

Cruentus

Adventurer
Did the movie ever acknowledge Gary Gygax or did it just say Hasbro & WotC? I've heard claims it did acknowledge Gygax, Arneson, Greenwood, etc but like way at the end of the credits, but I don't know if any of this is actually true or not.
I didn’t watch the entire credits, but at one point it said “Based on DND by Hasbro” or something to that effect, which I took to be technically correct. The DND movie I watched was based on 5e, which Hasbro did “create”. I didn’t feel like they were claiming they created the entirety of Dungeons and Dragons.
 

Ath-kethin

Elder Thing
I've seen the movie 2x now, and I really like it overall. I do think it has the same problem as a lot of Marvel films, inasmuch as it feels too long but also like there isn't room to cut more out because it also feels kind of underdeveloped in places.

I thought Doric the druid was delightful, and I really liked Simon the sorcerer too. I'd cheerfully watch Hugh Grant watching paint dry, too, and he didn't disappoint. I also really liked the family dynamic of Elgin and Holga, and I love how their bond was clearly very deep and strong and that the movie showed us that instead of talking about it. Though as others have pointed out, some of Holga's scenes are likely to make 5e newbies sad when they try taking on a bucket load of enemies all by themselves the way she does and discover it doesn't quite work out the same way.

I also loved the way the group worked out plans and solutions and often just tried weird things - more than anything else that felt true to the spirit of D&D.

I have two major quibbles with the movie: the opening bit, which I feel could have been done differently and conveyed the same information without relying on old, problematic tropes, and I didn't love the bits with the red dragon either. I also felt like the movie snacked of rewrites and test audiences, because it was pretty inconsistent tonally and bounced around a lot.

It's interesting to hear folks griping about the halflings; I actually didn't realize they were supposed to BE halflings and took them as gnomes. As gnomes they look fine IMO.

Overall I found it very good, but I'm not sure I need to see it a 3rd time.
 
Last edited:

wellis

Explorer
Personally I kind of felt the bit where Edgin tried to talk about his sad backstory, before switching to humor as he tries to ask if Jarnathan was there, was kind of jarring and made it hard for me to really feel anything there.
 

ad_hoc

(they/them)
Personally I kind of felt the bit where Edgin tried to talk about his sad backstory, before switching to humor as he tries to ask if Jarnathan was there, was kind of jarring and made it hard for me to really feel anything there.

Really? For the tonal shift?

I felt it was the best way to do it. It's hard to have emotional weight at the beginning of the story before we've connected with the characters.

The first scenes also need to set the stage for what to expect in the movie which is a lot of humour.

I felt there were some really good emotional scenes later on that felt earned.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

Top