Yeah. People never agree on these things. And even if they somehow miraculously would, there is still the issue that real people and societies are complex. They tend to contain both traits that we might think as lawful and traits that we think are chaotic. Stark categorisations just do not work. Like I said earlier, it is just more informative to say that a person is impulsive and honourable than try to decide whether they're chaotic due their impulsiveness, lawful due their honour, or perhaps that these cancel each other out and they're neutral.
