General threadcrap redirect

[Panda-s1]

so dialogue options are in first person. at first I thought it was just an interesting stylistic choice, but then I realized it's probably an effective way to get around this issue:
[Edited out - not appropriate]

 

[Morrus]

@Panda-s1 that video really wasn't appropriate for this site.

 

[Panda-s1]

@Panda-s1 that video really wasn't appropriate for this site.

I mean, could you explain? a good number of these screenshots have dialogue options and that video was about dialogue options in video games.

 

[Morrus]

I mean, could you explain? a good number of these screenshots have dialogue options and that video was about dialogue options in video games.

It was a short video mainly featuring a profanity. If you have queries about moderation, please do not do so in-thread, as per the rules you've agreed to. I didn't give warning then, but please follow the moderation rules.

 

[Prakriti]

I mean, could you explain?

The F word.

 

[Panda-s1]

The F word.

okay, that would have been useful in the original reply.

 

[Morrus]

Note - I've moved this to Meta. The reason we don't allow challenging moderation in thread is exactly this -- it hijacks the thread and turns ito into a thread about moderation, and if it's allowed, 100% of moderated users will hijack the thread. This would make the site unusable. It's important that folks do not address moderation grievances and queries in-thread.