Yes, lets assume incompetence or malfeasance here instead of actual play and personal experience. I'm well aware of the theory.Your comments on Warlock are unfair and misinformed if you think that all they do is spam Eldritch blast. At second level you can get unlimited illusions and you get to cast 2 spells per SR, which means 4 or 6 spells per LR. The last mid-level warlock I played had a rod of the pact keeper +1, a wand of fireballs, and boots of flying. He spammed Eldritch blast a lot, but he also dropped a lot of fireballs, created a lot of illusions, and was the PC that manipulated the environment the most (lock the door, break down the bridge, etc...) I did not feel like an Eldritch Blast machine gun.
Wizard. You show your fan appreciation of the game by playing the class named after the corporation.
My propensity to have an intensity of opinion that is inversely related to my knowledge of an issue isn’t even in my top 100 list of flaws.
You know, I wouldn't even mind if there was an all encompassing focus on Eldritch Blast. But if they did, they should have gone full on 3e with it- I enjoyed swapping out shapes and essences.I side with [MENTION=6786252]Mephista[/MENTION] here. I love what a warlock should be, but the class is seriously handicapped by the nearly all-encompassing focus on that one spell.
No, the problem is definitely not that. Its the fact that, for most of the game, you only have two spell slots per rest; most games don't make it past level 11. And when you can't promise a recharge even every two battles, you're going to be relying on your at-wills a lot. If your party's relying on you for spells like Banishment or Fireball too? That's even a stronger restriction on when you can actually use said spell slots for when those situations come up.Personally, I think the problem is with the players who feel that they are somehow gimping themselves if they don't take eldritch blast and then back that spell up with hex and the +charisma to damage invocation.
The signature of champions.
Dude. I wrote about my play experience for over half of my post. Not theory. Practice.Yes, lets assume incompetence or malfeasance here instead of actual play and personal experience. I'm well aware of the theory.
Here's the thing. I wrote a comment about MY EXPERIENCE, and I was tired of the style. You jumped in and started talking about how I'm being unfair or incompetent playing it. You started writing about theoretical expected rests (so, yes, you were talking theory for at least part, so getting defensive about that is silly), which are unrealistic in actual game play. You then started talking about magic items somehow fixing, which are not something I, and many others, can count on. Hey, did you know I've actually played in games with no magic items? Even as a warlock?Dude. I wrote about my play experience for over half of my post. Not theory. Practice.