G
Guest 7037866
Guest
Yeah... I was thinking we were getting a 2024 DMG preview of new boons.![]()
That crossed my mind as well.And here I was hoping "boom" was a typo for "boon" and we were getting some new info.....oh well.
Yeah... I was thinking we were getting a 2024 DMG preview of new boons.![]()
That crossed my mind as well.And here I was hoping "boom" was a typo for "boon" and we were getting some new info.....oh well.
Nha, more like 3 classes, but with more choices within them.
Warrior, Expert, Spellcaster.
Your ideal ranger could be either a Pathfinder Warrior, an Explorer Expert or a Sojourner Spellcaster, for exemple.
Nah.Nah.
Only warrior and magic-user.![]()
Nah.Nah.
Just one class: Muderhobo.
Everything is else is either a subclass, or narrative flavor.
The reason 5E has some narrow classes is essentially cowardice.
What terminology would you suggest to improve this? I'm not being a prat when I ask this (I mean aside from in the sense that I perhaps just am one!), I genuinely wonder. Because I wasn't seeing any appropriate words to hand - maybe my vocabulary is simply lacking?You do realize that accusation makes it look less like a solidly reasoned argument, and more like you have an axe to grind and wanna insult people?
The current playtest monk is very tanky if I understand @Clint_L correctly.I wonder if they will be crazy and bump the Monk HP to a D10 for the Tank comment.
Well, based on what they've laid down about last year's response to the Sorcerer UA (people loce the Sorcerer in 5E), I would say the kot likely explanatio is the Next Sorcerer got panned by surveys, and people asked for a 3E style one.I don't know what could have inspired that