The Forsaken One
Explorer
I'll put in 10-15 shops somewhere during next week. You can hold me by me word on that. No time now but then you all know that I'm putting something in this plan!
jgbrowning said:I've put all of the craft/professions from A Magical Medieval Society: Western Europe up on our web page as a download.
David Argall said:"Boarding houses I'm not so sure about. I think these were a much later concept. But I'll investigate. If you know of a source that talks about medieval boarding houses, point it out to me"
I doubt you can find too much on the history of boarding houses. It is likely one of those things that are just always there and get little notice.
lalato said:
Ahh... but we're not talking about your common barnyard sheep here. We're talking about Argali sheep... which in D&D terms would be classified as dire sheep. In the real world, Argali sheep are rarely domesticated. They grow up to 5 feet tall, and live mainly in the mountains of central asia (from kyrgizstan to tibet).
Argali sheep offer good meat, can produce drinkable milk (similar to goat's milk), and can be shorn for wool.
I never imagined the countryside would be filled with large ranches. I always assumed that the nearby land would be a mixture of noble land holdings (including Lady Kelvin's lands), and land owned by villagers.
The noble lands would be dotted with small farms, and villages to support those farms. The villagers/farmers on noble lands would work the land for a small share of the crop/animals... or they would be given a small plot of land to farm for their own profit, but would be taxed on that profit.
The independent villages would either be one large extended family or a cooperative of a few families. These villages would attempt to be as self sufficient as possible with a lot of mixed farming and animals. They would pay tax to the city for protection.
Joe B... is the above too far off medieval reality?
--sam
lalato said:Ahh... but we're not talking about your common barnyard sheep here. We're talking about Argali sheep... which in D&D terms would be classified as dire sheep. In the real world, Argali sheep are rarely domesticated. They grow up to 5 feet tall, and live mainly in the mountains of central asia (from kyrgizstan to tibet).
Argali sheep offer good meat, can produce drinkable milk (similar to goat's milk), and can be shorn for wool.
I never imagined the countryside would be filled with large ranches. I always assumed that the nearby land would be a mixture of noble land holdings (including Lady Kelvin's lands), and land owned by villagers.
The noble lands would be dotted with small farms, and villages to support those farms. The villagers/farmers on noble lands would work the land for a small share of the crop/animals... or they would be given a small plot of land to farm for their own profit, but would be taxed on that profit.
The independent villages would either be one large extended family or a cooperative of a few families. These villages would attempt to be as self sufficient as possible with a lot of mixed farming and animals. They would pay tax to the city for protection.
Joe B... is the above too far off medieval reality?
--sam
Tallow said:Granted. Is there a reason though that two or three particularly influential nobles or influential argali herdsmen who became nobles (and banded the various independent argali tribes under his wing) couldn't have grabbed up, owned, purchased or claimed a crap load of land and continued to herd huge herds of argali sheep? If there were ways to make this profitable, I'm sure even a medieval person could have a "ranch."
Andy Christian
jgbrowning said:
Damn, those some scary sheep! I 'bout soiled me armor.... No it all sounds great. Just wanted a work of caution because i wasn't aware how aware you were.....
Few things you might want to look into with the Argali:
1. Wool yield and quality. if neither of these are good or if there are more "tame" sheep that fit the bill better the landowners may think of importing a sheep instead of using a more indigious variaty.
2. milk yields. how do the milk yields compare with the above varieties?
I know these two questions may qualify you for an honorary soil sciences degree...
joe b.
Damn, those some scary sheep! I 'bout soiled me armor.... No it all sounds great. Just wanted a work of caution because i wasn't aware how aware you were.....
Few things you might want to look into with the Argali:
1. Wool yield and quality. if neither of these are good or if there are more "tame" sheep that fit the bill better the landowners may think of importing a sheep instead of using a more indigious variaty.
2. milk yields. how do the milk yields compare with the above varieties?
I know these two questions may qualify you for an honorary soil sciences degree...
lalato said:
1. From the limited resources I've found (most Argali resources are for hunters)... In the real world, Argali wool isn't the highest quality. Having said that, most real world Argali wool is from animals that are close to wild as very few are domesticated... poor diet may have something to do with the wool quality. It's my assumption that with the proper diet, Argali wool would be mid grade, at best. It's not the highest quality, but if you want to keep warm during winter... it will be a lot better than Water Silk. As far as yield... I don't think the sheep in Australia/New Zealand have anything to worry about from Argali. I suspect, though, that the animal would produce better and more wool with an improved diet.
2. In the real world Argali can produce milk... The milk is similar to goat's milk. Since the animal is much larger than a goat, I would say the yield is better than a goat... but probably nowhere near a cow.
With either wool or milk... animal husbandry over several generations of argali might produce some really fine wool... or a better milk producer.
--sam
p.s. sorry for hijacking this thread, Buttercup...