Machiavelli
First Post
That mythical races one sounds absolutely, horribly, terribly breakable. It's a diopsid, basically, only even better and without a level adjustment. -2 Strength? How would that translate into usable game mechanics? Maybe -2 Strength for attacks and checks having anything to do with those arms? Or how about -2 Strength to the character as a whole while using those arms? What about using both small arms for one 2-handed weapon, and both big arms for one 1-handed weapon... would that be -4 and -0, or -2 and -0 to the Strength?
Also, is a character with Multiweapon Fighting and 4 one-handed weapons (2 of them at -1 attack and damage) balanced against a character with Two-Weapon Fighting and 2 one-handed weapons? I really, really don't think so. How about a character who can carry and use at will 4 separate items, one at a time, without any penalty at all, and without the need for Quickdraw or whatnot? Seems like less of a problem, but still a problem indeed.
I'm tempted to come up with a race that would have four useful arms and be what I would call balanced at LA +0, just to see what it would look like...
Also, is a character with Multiweapon Fighting and 4 one-handed weapons (2 of them at -1 attack and damage) balanced against a character with Two-Weapon Fighting and 2 one-handed weapons? I really, really don't think so. How about a character who can carry and use at will 4 separate items, one at a time, without any penalty at all, and without the need for Quickdraw or whatnot? Seems like less of a problem, but still a problem indeed.
I'm tempted to come up with a race that would have four useful arms and be what I would call balanced at LA +0, just to see what it would look like...