The equator should evidence dense rainforests, such as the Congos in Africa.
Yeah, the rainforests look like they are starting to happen, but not yet an equatorial belt. Arid deserts are a distance north of the equator. So, the Mortal World map seems to have its equator still to the south off the edge of the map.I would say "could evince" dense rainforests.
I was trying to keep the map as big as feasible, so as to minimize any blank spots.
And with only the bare minimum of interpretative revisions. The top of that map simply cannot be the north pole, due to projection issues. Whereas there could be a fantasy world where the equator is a desert zone.
However, in your revision, the bottom of the boardgame map might be at 10 or 20 degrees north.
Reasonable, yet if going with the Tropic of Cancer, then might as well also go with the Arctic Circle as well...though that is less fitting.It might even be, the southern edge of the Mortal map is something like the Tropic of Cancer, judging by the deserts.
I would say, 20° latitude is the southern edge.
That is probably a good call: Arctic Circle to Tropic of Cancer, but round numbers.Reasonable, yet if going with the Tropic of Cancer, then might as well also go with the Arctic Circle as well...though that is less fitting.
An equanimous pair of offsets would be a 10 degree margin north and south.
The more I look at the Mortal geography, the more solid 20 thru 70 feels. Something like Mexico to Norway, parts of Greenland, the Sahara to Alaska, and also parts of India, with patches of rainforests here and there.Well, I don't necessarily agree with those numbers, just offering some options for your own conception.