Hussar said:One thing that surprised me recently is how small cities in England are today. Ignoring London for a moment and the next largest city is smaller than 1 million (according to Wiki anyway) with most cities in the 300 k range. Now, there are quite a number of cities, but, still, I didn't realize how small most English cities really are.
Knowing nothing about how things actually are in .uk, I wonder if there are more than a few clusters of cities that are effectively the same metro area. The entire US west coast (California + Oregon + Washington state) has a population roughly similar to the UK in a much larger area (and with about half of its population in one metro area -- greater LA), and there are only two cities with a population of over a million (LA and San Diego). Granted, San Jose is just under a million, and both the San Fransisco Bay Area (SF/San Jose/Oakland and suburbs) and the Seattle metro area (Seattle plus suburbs) have well over a million people. And that's a fairly common pattern in the US. I know North American cities typically have substantially more suburban sprawl than their European counterparts, but it's still likely a factor.