UngeheuerLich said:I am concerned about the lack of bard, because I recently play a lot with girls, who favour them... (and also they are my favourite class... yes, i have been mocked enough for that, thanks^^)
WotC_Miko said:ha. Well, at the risk of enforcing a stereotype... I just made up a bard using "unbeta'ed" class rules. He is, without any doubt, made of AWESOMESAUCE even in raw form. So you might encourage your female players to try something else for awhile--seriously, this is the first edition where I've been interested in playing a straight-up *fighter,* and that's saying something--but assure them that the bard will be back and shinier than ever. (No, don't ask me, I can't tell you anything about it yet. )
Mirtek said:I see it the same way, because the power doesn't talk about the attack being negated.
I also think that the gnoll A in round 1 should have been able to make the follow up attack against Erais.
PS: Nice description and nice pics.
Novem5er said:Lessons Learned:
It was a pretty good fight! For being 5 levels above the PCs, the Gnolls still got taken out.
Cirex said:The fluff leads to think that the attack is negated. There's a similar maneouver at B9S and I rule like it negates the attack.
I'm going to rule that it negates the attack till we get more information.
EDIT : Very nice review, thanks for testing it!
Still looking for a reply to this.Rechan said:I'm looking through the "Monsters and More" packet, and I'm wondering, do all soldiers mark? Because I don't see anything that makes a soldier a good soldier, except their high DEFs. Where's the OAs/"Stickiness"/Marking?