Wisdom Penalty
First Post
I thought I understood Cover, and now I'm no longer certain. Please see the attached image. Please assume we don't have any weird feats or whatever; these creatures are regular Medium-size schlubs.
Green has a short bow.
Yellow has a reach weapon.
Red has a melee weapon.
A few questions:
1) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Yellow without provoking AOs because he has Cover relative to Yellow.
2) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Yellow without any Cover penalties because Yellow does not have Cover relative to Green.
3) T/F: #1 and #2 contradict themselves.
4) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Red, but Red has (soft) Cover from Yellow.
5) T/F: Because Yellow has a reach weapon, Green is considered "in melee" even if he doesn't need to worry about AOs. Therefore, Green suffers a -4 penalty when firing at Yellow because Yellow is "in melee" as well (and Green does not have Precise Shot).
Green has a short bow.
Yellow has a reach weapon.
Red has a melee weapon.
A few questions:
1) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Yellow without provoking AOs because he has Cover relative to Yellow.
2) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Yellow without any Cover penalties because Yellow does not have Cover relative to Green.
3) T/F: #1 and #2 contradict themselves.
4) T/F: Green can fire his bow at Red, but Red has (soft) Cover from Yellow.
5) T/F: Because Yellow has a reach weapon, Green is considered "in melee" even if he doesn't need to worry about AOs. Therefore, Green suffers a -4 penalty when firing at Yellow because Yellow is "in melee" as well (and Green does not have Precise Shot).