buzzard
First Post
Dinkeldog said:Fathead, I've been in the situation of joining a group. They were 8th level except one that was 7th about to go to 8th. I came in at 6th. It blows chunks. Big chunks that you didn't have the foresight to chew particularly well the first time.
Really, gaming is not work or college, and one shouldn't be needlessly be penalized while playing. If your player with a fighter decides he'd rather be a druid, why punish him for changing?
I have no sympathy whatsoever fo this view. People deserve some amount of credit for sticking to a character. They also deserve credit for 'paying their dues' with their character, so new people should not be able to come in ahead of veterans. I'd probably manage to be a bit annoyed that some guy joins the game and surpasses the people who have been there for years.
Especially at higher levels, it is easier to make a character that you really want all at once rather than building him up level by level. For example, if you were builing a 12th level wizard, would you take toughness as a feat? A first level one is quite likely to do so, but nobody things of wasting a feat on that if they're 12th. Say I was making a high level fighter/monk type. Building from scratch would be difficult. Starting at 10th, I would take those four levels of fighter and get weapon finess unarmed, weapon focus unarmed, and weapon spec unarmed, but never take improved unarmed combat, since I know I'd be a monk later. Playing from 1st would make that extremely unlikely.
I also have had experiences where gamers have ditched characters simply because they were not quite twinked enough.
Though, back to the subject at hand.
A) 13 years- BFD if she plays in a way that doesn't work at the table it counts for squat.
B) She sounds like she has a beef with your DMing style, so let her find a new one.
C) Looks like the solution has already presented itself and she is leaving, it ain't broke so don't fix it.
buzzard