Kraydak said:*That* won't be in the final version (or if it is, all the other defenders just became obsolete).
I wouldn't expect the above Marking mechanic to make it into the final version either, the amount of damage mitigated is absurdly high.
Kraydak said:*That* won't be in the final version (or if it is, all the other defenders just became obsolete).
I wouldn't expect the above Marking mechanic to make it into the final version either, the amount of damage mitigated is absurdly high.
epochrpg said:Why would anyone playing a swordmage not be an Eladrin? A feat for +2 damage with swords and +2 int? Can we say "no-brainer?"
epochrpg said:Why would anyone playing a swordmage not be an Eladrin? A feat for +2 damage with swords and +2 int? Can we say "no-brainer?"
With the snippet of the class we've seen, yes you can say no brainer. When we see more, who knows... I could show someone a halfling rogue build (like KotSF Rogue), and they would likely say, why would anyone playing a rogue, not be a halfling?epochrpg said:Why would anyone playing a swordmage not be an Eladrin? A feat for +2 damage with swords and +2 int? Can we say "no-brainer?"
Because there might be a charisma build. Which might then question "Why would anyone being a swordmage NOT be a half-elf or a tiefling or a..."epochrpg said:Why would anyone playing a swordmage not be an Eladrin? A feat for +2 damage with swords and +2 int? Can we say "no-brainer?"
Well they need to fix the damn thing quick, because it comes out in a few months.Kraydak said:*That* won't be in the final version (or if it is, all the other defenders just became obsolete).
I wouldn't expect the above Marking mechanic to make it into the final version either, the amount of damage mitigated is absurdly high.