Flexor the Mighty!
18/100 Strength!
Isgrimnur said:How about 'The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen'....5/5 in my opinion....
Forgot that one. 1/5
A terrible movie and I've never read the source comics.
Isgrimnur said:How about 'The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen'....5/5 in my opinion....
TheLe said:Hence the 3/5 rating. Not show off, not falling behind. I think they are excellent starting movies, but definitely lacking when compared to other movies.
Keep in mind that Superman I was excellent, as was Blade I, and Batman Begins.
I can excuse X-men since it was a "team" movie, which can be harder since you have so many main characters, but there is no reason why Spider-man couldn't be better, especially when compared to the three movies I listed above.
`Le
I realized that eventually. My problem is that I had no idea it existed. And this is from someone who saw the pilot for the Destroyer tv series when it aired.TheLe said:Nope. I am talking about the Justice League of America Pilot from 1997. Here you go:
Ankh-Morpork Guard said:He IS the X-Men's real leader, the one capable of pulling them all together and pushing them to be the best they can. The movies ended up giving this role to Wolverine because of how insanely popular the character is, but that's just not Wolvie.
Marsden did quite well as the good guy in Superman Returns, and the only reason Cyclops fell by the wayside in the X-franchise is that the writers didn't give him anything to work with, it was all "jean, jean, jean". I mean, in X2 they had N'Sync singing in Cyclops' car stereo! Marsden had to beg the writers and director to include some hand-to-hand combat for Cyclops when he's taken at Magneto's plastic prison, otherwise he'd have fallen without firing a blast at all.SWBaxter said:I think the movies gave that role to Wolverine because Hugh Jackman could pull it off as an actor, whereas - hmm, whatsisname, lemme look it up... here we go, James Marsden - couldn't. Now, you could well argue that the major reason the producers got a decent actor to play Wolverine was because of his comic book popularity, but that decision was made long before X3 was a twinkle in anybody's eye. Once X3 rolled around with its inspiring speeches, there were only three people on the set who could've made that role work, and none of them were playing Cyclops. C'est la vie.
SWBaxter said:I think the movies gave that role to Wolverine because Hugh Jackman could pull it off as an actor, whereas - hmm, whatsisname, lemme look it up... here we go, James Marsden - couldn't. Now, you could well argue that the major reason the producers got a decent actor to play Wolverine was because of his comic book popularity, but that decision was made long before X3 was a twinkle in anybody's eye. Once X3 rolled around with its inspiring speeches, there were only three people on the set who could've made that role work, and none of them were playing Cyclops. C'est la vie.
TheLe said:A good theory, but unfortunately it is incorrect.
Dannyalcatraz said:There was also a Marvel approved TV show based on the X-Men...but while the powers were similar, the names were changed. It never looked good enough for me to watch.
Dannyalcatraz said:There was also a Flash TV show back in 1991...quickly cancelled. It was one of the most expensive shows per episode to produce, dud to its super-speed effects.
I actually liked the Flash show, but it kept getting pre-empted by major sporting events, and even had its slot moved a few times to go against heavy hitters, so of course it failed.