Your definition of core is not WOTC's which is more "not optional not setting specific" & in fact covers pretty much everything except themes & dragonmarks.
Yes, I know. It wasn't my intention to follow WotC's definition, which is basically meaningless, as you point out.
The minimum needed to play is the RC plus some character rules plus some monsters.
In other words, DDI
.
Not sure what this means except a lot of people still like their books & players outnumber DMS at least 4:1. OTOH My home group probably owns fewer books put together than me - PHB & pertinent class books typically or just DDI for one.
Players might outnumber DMs 4:1, but I would guess that DM's purchasing at least four times as much stuff as player's, if not significantly more. This is just anecdotal, I own about 30 4E products; each of the other five members of my group own a PHB (because I asked them to purchase it), and I am not sure if anyone owns anything else other than dice and maybe a PHB2. So the DM in my group (me) owns over 80% of the total 4E books, and probably more like 95% of the total RPG books.
My group might be on the extreme side although I'd guess that the average primary DM in a group owns 50% or more of the total books.
So my taste means more since I have spent (at the very least) 50% more than you?
Huh? I'm not sure what you're trying to say here, or why you are, or sound, irked.
Anyway, I have certainly seen a couple or 10 other posters state similar feelings (skipping books because they are available on the DDI) but do you have access to some stats that show its more prevalent? And if you do, can you honestly tell me that each of everyone of those people really would have bought the book if there had been no DDI? - For example, did each of those with said opinion buy every single book during the previous editions?
My guess is the answer is a big fat NO.
People rationalize _all_the_time_
Again, what's your problem? What am I saying that is offensive or is controversial at all?
I'm pretty much exactly on the same page with you as to what I have already bought.
I'm not on the same page with you about the hardbacks though. I thought I would be, but once I got a copy of the Essentials books, I realized I like them a lot. They're not as bulky, and work great for just sitting and reading.
I'm trying to be open to them! Actually, I don't even mind the digest books, as long as they aren't used for everything. I really like the RC, for instance, but I don't like the "Sundering of the
Player's Handbook." I would much rather have seen the two
Heroes book as one hardcover, say
Player's Handbook 4.
Which brings me back to what my point was- that they've sort of accepted that the rules are being gotten/used primarily through the DDI, with the books serving a kind of backup duty... The seemingly rare moments when you're at the table and need to look up a rule. (Seriously, everything is so self contained I almost never look up anything at the table.)
Yes, that was pretty much the gist of my OP. DDI is becoming more and more the focus of the D&D rules, thus "The New Core Rulebook."
As for the books' draw, I think it is simply that most people still prefer a nice paper copy, both to enjoy on their bookshelf, browsing through on the couch, or using at the game table.
Unfortunately it is looking like the price point is already going up to $25, though (
Class Compendium and
Mordenkainen's are both $24.95, although their format remains to be announced).
I also think they're being re-formatted to a size that just so happens to line up with most of the e-readers out there... My guess is we'll see them released in some sort of e-reader format really soon.
True.
Their change in strategy is pretty much what you would expect if DDI was cutting into sales of (what used to be called) splat books. Could be a coincidence...
I doubt it.