MichaelSomething
Legend
WOTC hiring a sociologist for D&D.
IMO Jack is solid, as is Rogue. They’re all rogueish. Not JoAT, just Jack. Being a Jack is an actual thing in English that means you’re a professional at a job, and when used derogatorily can mean a scoundrel, a poor quality tradesman, or simply be a classist insult.Yeah, agreed. I've seen several options over the years: Expert, Thief, Sneak, Jack-of-all-Trades, etc. None of them are great.
It’s not fiddly, it’s an increasing benefit.this seems to fiddly.
there is a reason that Bear totem is most popular. it's simple,
No thanks. I’ll keep letting barbarians choose when to use reckless attack and when not.Rage:
you can rage on your turn. No action.
you have advantages on all attacks, saves and checks with STR and CON
all attacks have advantages on you
you have resistance to all damage.
gain bonus damage per barbarian table
duration 1 min
"insert normal requirement for sustaining rage"
At very least they could rename it to 3rd circle or something like that.Matching spell levels to character levels, i.e. you get 3rd level spells when you're 3rd level.
They won't do this because of tradition. I can see it happening somewhere down the line, like for a someday maybe, imaginary 6th edition.
It happened in 4E.Matching spell levels to character levels, i.e. you get 3rd level spells when you're 3rd level.
They won't do this because of tradition. I can see it happening somewhere down the line, like for a someday maybe, imaginary 6th edition.
That would be great.And yes: making the ability score and the modifier into one thing. Hell, get rid of ability save proficiencies while you're at it.