Speak for yourself. Plenty of us who grew up with early versions of the game are perfectly happy with later changes, additions and alterations. Not all of us are still living in 1974.The intense war over D&D is one of "ownership". The fans who grew up with the game from almost day one resent the game getting turned into something it has never been before and thus you have warfare. Right or wrong, I'm not judging. I'm just explaining why 13th Age gets a pass and D&D 5e and 4e do not.
Speak for yourself. Plenty of us who grew up with early versions of the game are perfectly happy with later changes, additions and alterations. Not all of us are still living in 1974.
That is fine. So you don't fit in that group. Tons of people do. Obviously if you feel a sense of ownership but the changes fit your conceptions of how the game should go then you are fine with it. Its like if I said I wanted to paint your house pink. If you really liked pink you might be okay with that even though it's your house. I would not like a pink house so I'd object. And this is just a hyperbolic example. I'm not saying anyone really wants a pink house.
It's very embedded in 13A, and part of the overall game math. I would worry about houseruling it out of there.Will it be pretty easy to house rule out? Seems kind of like just existing fo accounting sake. I didnt know it was even in 13th A' , but we never got that thick into the rules, and we didnt playtest 5e that far.
jh
It's very embedded in 13A, and part of the overall game math. I would worry about houseruling it out of there.
In Next, it was a microscopic thing, and last I heard, it was removed anyway.
Personally, I was wondering when we'd get around to deleting this no-longer-necessary subforum.
Given the very edition-warry replies we still see to this topic, I'd say the sub-forum is still quite necessary.