• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

Warlocks & Familiars...

RolandOfGilead

First Post
Ok, Under the obtain familiar feat, it says that "all levels in arcane spellcasting classes stack regarding the masters level of a familiar..."

However, is this implicit if you dont take obtain familiar?

In other words, if I'm a sorceror 1 / Warlock 6 would my master level be 7?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Particle_Man

Explorer
A bard 7/Sorceror 1 would not get familiar benefits as an 8th Sorceror unless they had the feat Obtain Familiar, so I assume that a Warlock 7/Sorceror 1 would also be out of luck without that feat. I guess that might be an interesting secondary benefit of the feat for arcane multiclass sorceror/wizards.
 

ThoughtfulOwl

First Post
Put it this way: normally, only classes who grant you a familiar count toward your level as a familiar master; if you take the feat, all your arcane classes count as granting a familiar.
 


Particle_Man

Explorer
Well, the Mystic Theurge wouldn't count the divine levels used in the prereq, but otherwise, yes, at the cost of a feat the Mystic Theurge levels would count for familiar advancement.
 

Silveras

First Post
I think the operational guide here is p.18 of CA, where it discusses Warlocks and Prestige Classes. "A Warlock cannot qualify for prestige classes with spellcasting level requirements, as he never actually learns to cast spells."

By that thinking, the Warlock class is not an arcane spellcasting class, and does not qualify to stack, even with the Obtain Familiar feat.

Of course, I am inclined to think that the feat was created with Warlocks in mind in the first place, so it may be just an example of poorly chosen wording.

My real objection to the feat is that it is clearly BETTER than the standard class ability it is designed to emulate, since you get that ability PLUS the ability to stack class levels that would not otherwise stack.
 

ThoughtfulOwl

First Post
Silveras said:
I think the operational guide here is p.18 of CA, where it discusses Warlocks and Prestige Classes. "A Warlock cannot qualify for prestige classes with spellcasting level requirements, as he never actually learns to cast spells."

By that thinking, the Warlock class is not an arcane spellcasting class, and does not qualify to stack, even with the Obtain Familiar feat.

Of course, I am inclined to think that the feat was created with Warlocks in mind in the first place, so it may be just an example of poorly chosen wording.

Not really; the feat doesn't require spellcasting, only an arcane caster level, which warlocks have aplenty.

Silveras said:
My real objection to the feat is that it is clearly BETTER than the standard class ability it is designed to emulate, since you get that ability PLUS the ability to stack class levels that would not otherwise stack.

Levels from classes who grant a familiar already stack with each other; the feat just allows the remaining arcane classes to join the club.
 

Jalkain

First Post
ThoughtfulOwl said:
Levels from classes who grant a familiar already stack with each other; the feat just allows the remaining arcane classes to join the club.

I think the previous poster was making the point that a single feat will outperform the class ability when it comes to taking arcane castings PrCs that don't advance your familiar (which is virtually all of them).

As a random example, a Bard 7/Incantatrix 3 WITH the feat would have a familiar caster level of 10, whereas a Wizard 7/Incantatrix 3 WITHOUT the feat would have a familiar caster level of only 7. One feat allows the bard to go from having no familiar to having a better familiar!

I think the previous poster was suggesting that it should be split into two feats to avoid this situation.
 

hobgoblin

First Post
but remeber, you have to burn a feat to get it at all. a wizard or sorceror get it as a class benefit on top of the normal feats...
 

Silveras

First Post
ThoughtfulOwl said:
Not really; the feat doesn't require spellcasting, only an arcane caster level, which warlocks have aplenty.

Complete Arcane said:
For the purpose of determining familiar abilities that depend on your arcane caster class level, your levels in all classes that allow you to cast arcane spells stack.

Thus, since Warlocks do not actually cast spells, their levels do not stack for purposes of determining the abilities of the familiar.

ThoughtfulOwl said:
Levels from classes who grant a familiar already stack with each other; the feat just allows the remaining arcane classes to join the club.

Uhm, no, it also allows arcane spellcaster classes that do not normally get a familiar to obtain one and to have their levels stack for purposes of determining the familiar's abilities. It grants the base ability and enhances it all at once.
 

Voidrunner's Codex

Remove ads

Top