IMO, (and I did not read the seven pages of replies this post has already received) an abuser's reputation isn't enough to effect business relationships until someone makes that reputation into news. The latest allegations made it news. You don't lose business connections for being a bad person; you lose them for being outed as a bad person to the right people or enough people. It's not a perfect system, but it seems to have worked in this case (if not a bit late). There are certainly enough allegations and enough corroborating witnesses to presume that they are not simply made up. And no business, especially in an industry that is currently working hard against its own reputation of failing at inclusivity, wants to be attached to a reputation like ZS's.