Aus_Snow
First Post
I'm with you on all of your post except this part. Not because 'Shakespeare is only for adults', and not because 'Harry Potter is only for kids' either, but well, it mightn't have been the best two examples to fit there. Shakespeare is probably more suited, on the whole, to adults - 'educated adults' to borrow a phrase from this very thread, in fact. And Harry Potter, while it is no doubt readable by er, anyone who is capable of reading it, I suppose, was actually written as kids' stuff. Just like Narnia and many others before it. Sure, there are plenty of adults who read kids' books, but. . . again, maybe not the best examples.Are you saying that Shakespeare is only for adults, and Harry Potter is only for kids?
For the rest, hear hear! And yeah, I know what you were saying anyway. It just seemed a bit unfortunate, is all.