Vanuslux
Explorer
cleavthorn said:I was also toying around with the idea of "planar animals" and such.
I really like the idea of a supplement on planar animals...I'd get a lot of use out of that.
cleavthorn said:I was also toying around with the idea of "planar animals" and such.
cleavthorn said:Okay, I have to know. Animal Archives 1: North American Prehistoric Animals is out. AA2: South American Animals is coming soon. AA3 & 4 are also in the works. (One of those is North American Animals)
What type of animal archive would you like to see?
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->I try my very best to research the creatures I have made for the Animal Archives series. The amount of time I put into these FAR exceeds the payback monetarily I get. I really want to make quality products though.Mammal-like reptiles are always a good idea. Just don't make the BAD mistake of calling a dimetrodon a dinosaur.
What's nice, they're generally not depicted as being as outright viscious as dinosaurs are, so you don't have to feel the urge to beef them up. They're just big scaly animals.
I'm afraid I have to respectfully disagree with you, Nell. I obviously can't change what you are willing to buy, but I don't think I would have made ANY of the Animal Archives if I hadn't done them this way. By making this series a bit at a time, I truly believe I am producing a better product."All of them, honestly. I'm much more willing to buy one, really big, animal book, than 5 or 10 little ones. There are alot of animals that are either common across multiple continents, or so close to other types that having multiple references wouldn't be really efficient, ie, coyote/dingo/dog...different creatures, but with more similarities than differences, and better handled (I think) with single entry and variant stats noted, than multiple entries in multiple documents."