Why doesn't WotC license older editions?


log in or register to remove this ad




I think it's because no one would buy them. Or not enough to be profitable. Everyone who wants a copy of the 1e rules either already owns them or can easily acquire a second hand copy. If 3e was making decent money for WotC there would never have been a 4e.
 

I think it's too late for WOTC to license older editions.

Smaller guys have already moved in, and have acted way too fast for the behemoth to follow. They'd have to compete with established names on the niche market, since their own IP is already committed to the current brand of D&D.

It would cause brand dilution for them, and waste resources.

Beseides, if anyone is NOT playing 4e now, it's probably for pretty serious taste reasons, such as writing style and fun of the product, and convincing them to change is not going to work overnight.

So, while they are doing their 4e stuff, let's have fun with our 3pp products.

Huzzah !!!
 

If 3e was making decent money for WotC there would never have been a 4e.

I think the issue is that "decent money" has a different meaning when applied to a WotC owned by Hasbro than it did for an independent WotC.

I also find it interesting that you are implying that 4E was primarily a cash grab.
 


Wow. I remember that thread. It began as "why doesn´t Wotc license an older edition i like" and turned into "let me prove to you that 4e fails on different levels." Let´s see how long it takes until the necroed thread goes down the same route.
 

Wow. I remember that thread. It began as "why doesn´t Wotc license an older edition i like" and turned into "let me prove to you that 4e fails on different levels." Let´s see how long it takes until the necroed thread goes down the same route.

Reynard already inferred someone else's comment about 4e being a cash grab. It's already begun.
 

Remove ads

Top