Can't speak for [MENTION=20323]Quickleaf[/MENTION] , but I would have preferred they released a CB that had, at a bare minimum, the functionality of the old CB. I'm happy they're making progress, I'm happy they're addressing important issues, but I do think there's still criticism warranted.Would you prefer they ignore those things in favor of adding to the pile of things that need to be supported by the CB?
Because it sounds like you're complaining about WotC actually addressing issues and complaints that many people had with the online CB. They left that stuff out, and people rightfully criticized them for it. Now they've put that stuff back in, and people are still criticizing them for it.
I don't get it.
*shrug*
Can't speak for [MENTION=20323]Quickleaf[/MENTION] , but I would have preferred they released a CB that had, at a bare minimum, the functionality of the old CB. I'm happy they're making progress, I'm happy they're addressing important issues, but I do think there's still criticism warranted.
THis was not listed in the bugs they fixed but they did fix it for my fighter.
"Features that let you replace one element with another, such as retraining and multiclass power swap feats, do not work correctly in some cases."
So. Damn. Happy.
I think you're misunderstanding my criticism of Quickleaf's comment. I get the unhappiness with the current CB. I can easily wrap my mind around how someone would feel cheated or ripped off with their DDI subscription.Exactly.
While every step towards equalling the quality of what we had a year ago is a good step, WotC chose the path they are walking when they decided to take the most popular parts of a subscription service that a lot of us are already paying for and replace them with unfinished tools.
I think you're misunderstanding my criticism of Quickleaf's comment... But to gripe about receiving a feature you feel entitled to having and not much else? Just doesn't seem kosher in my book.