I wish the class was called "psionist" instead of "mystic". The latter just seems so generic and could easily encompass other classes. Couldn't "mystic" easily also include "wizard" and "cleric"? Psionist is a lot less generic. I hope they keep the flavour of the Dark Sun psionics.
I mean, we have such classes as "Fighter," "Rogue," "Barbarian," "Sorcerer," "Warlock," and even "Wizard." All of those names are generic, and could have meant anything when those classes were introduced to D&D. Our concepts of what those class names mean came after the class was already named.
What the various reactions to the Mystic and the new Fighter UA subclasses has taught me is that class names really just aren't important in the grand scheme of things because no matter what a new class/subclass is named, somebody will complain that it's either too specific or it's not specific enough.
Last edited: