D&D (2024) replacing Constitution with Energy

[Umbran]

You may not be aware, but you seem to be splitting up your own topic into separate threads. You might want to consolidate them into a coherent presentation before continuing.

 

[Ancalagon]

I was hesitant to say something but... yeah. This presentation style makes it very hard to follow what you are trying to achieve/do

 

[Snarf Zagyg]

I am so confused.

Why is the Bard considered an original spellcaster? If the Bard is, why not the Paladin and Ranger (all three got their spells separately).

 

[le Redoutable]

sorry, I was thinking that, to obtain audience it was smarter to "split topic"
also, I'm a little frenchie with troubles in english use
so I beg your pardon, please don't remove my account

 

[Ancalagon]

Ok, so you are talking about AD&D first edition.

... which is not the first edition of D&D, so it may not count as "original", but that's nit-picking.

But are they the original spellcasting classes at all? You've already replaced the cleric with the necromancer for ... unclear reasons.

 

[Ancalagon]

I am so confused.

Why is the Bard considered an original spellcaster? If the Bard is, why not the Paladin and Ranger (all three got their spells separately).

I too am struggling to see what the OP is trying to achieve or communicate.

 

[Ancalagon]

... and isn't the Cleric some sort of a Necromancer , with reference à la Hokuto Kenshiro ( Ken le Survivant ) , as in the Movie " Fist Of The North Star " ?

... SOME clerics are sort sort of necromancers. Many aren't at all!

 

[le Redoutable]

strange,
clerics have an affinity with Undeads,
still there is a difference with Healers;
whatever the curse may be,
I like very much the idea of merging Assassins and Necromancers

 

[le Redoutable]

ben... I work for the 3rd Millenium Bible,
the Bible of Roleplaying games

 

[Umbran]

sorry, I was thinking that, to obtain audience it was smarter to "split topic"

So, don't do that, please. If your topic is interesting enough to have three threads, it'll grow to be three threads naturally. We can't have folks deciding that they want audience, and so post more and more and more threads.

Each thread should be independent, with enough information in its first post to discuss the topic. You were making it so people had to read three threads to know enough to post in one, which isn't a good approach - it leads to frustration and confusion.

also, I'm a little frenchie with troubles in english use
so I beg your pardon, please don't remove my account

We don't remove accounts for a couple extra threads.