D&D (2024) Wizards of the Coast Backtracks on D&D Beyond and 2014 Content

457249269_918504900314811_875922287646718169_n.jpg

Wizards of the Coast posted an overnight update stating that they are not going forward with previously released plans to require those wishing to use some 2014 content on D&D Beyond to use the Homebrew function to manually enter it. Instead, all the content including spells and magic items will be included. From the update:


Last week we released a Changelog detailing how players would experience the 2024 Core Rulebooks on D&D Beyond. We heard your feedback loud and clear and thank you for speaking up.

Our excitement around the 2024 Core Rulebooks led us to view these planned updates as welcome improvements and free upgrades to existing content. We misjudged the impact of this change, and we agree that you should be free to choose your own way to play. Taking your feedback to heart, here’s what we’re going to do:

Players who only have access to the 2014 Player’s Handbook will maintain their character options, spells, and magical items in their character sheets. Players with access to the 2024 and 2014 digital Player’s Handbooks can select from both sources when creating new characters. Players will not need to rely on Homebrew to use their 2014 player options, including spells and magic items, as recommended in previous changelogs.

Please Note:

Players will continue to have access to their free, shared, and purchased items on D&D Beyond, with the ability to use previously acquired player options when creating characters and using character sheets.

We are not changing players’ current character sheets, except for relabeling and renaming. Examples include Races to Species, Inspiration to Heroic Inspiration, and Cast Spell to Magic.

We’re dedicated to making D&D Beyond the ultimate digital toolset for Dungeons & Dragons, continuously enhancing the platform to ensure you can create, customize, and play your game just as you envision it. From your first one-shot to multi-year campaigns and everything in between, we're grateful to be on this journey with you.

- The D&D Studio
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott

Late to the thread, but I've seen a number of comments that amount to: "They listen to the customer and reversed course, so what's the problem".

The fact that they reversed course is a good thing, but that's a really low bar to judge them by.

What people should be asking is WHY does WoTC do these things?

I think we all know why, and the question then becomes -

Why do you want to continue supporting such a company?
Because they produced one of (if not...) the best character builder, encounter builder, compendium, combo Web app bar none for a ttrpg. I can use it regardless of device (laptop, tablet, phone, even through the browser of a console), and I don't have to bother with troubleshooting, installation or outdated tech and to top it off my group can share any book purchases amongst each other (as well as a ton of other people) all for less than I spend on coffee per month.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

A brief statement explaining that they have the right to change any material customers are paying to access, with or without warning, hardly seems meticulous. I just did it in a couple minutes. I'm sure they could spend an hour or so getting the wording right.
That is why you read them and acknowledge you read them before you can subscribe.
 


I’d say in a civilized society they do have a right, full stop. We pay taxes so we can have roads, schools, electricity, and other things. Clean water certainly belongs in that list too

This has implications. What if taxes dried up? Rights are, supposedly, always present.

So hypothetically, you keep the right but lose the money. At that point is slavery at hand?

Otherwise you could argue that water is a benefit instilled by paying taxes and not a right.

Hmm. Food for thought.
 

I am starting to think someone I read the other day was right when they said that WOTC might have have put out their original post as controversy to get people talking (any publicity is good publicity) so they could then step it back.
 

I am starting to think someone I read the other day was right when they said that WOTC might have have put out their original post as controversy to get people talking (any publicity is good publicity) so they could then step it back.

People will often say that companies that make mistakes are playing 4D chess.

However, in my experience, the companies are usually stumped just trying to get the checkers on the board.
 


That is my experience too, but WOTC keeps shooting themself in the foot. I want, just once, to think that they are not completely incompetent. :D

You know what they say!

WoTC only opens their mouth to change feet.

Still, I will reiterate what I keep saying- there's nothing wrong with working to get them to change their position. But when they do the right thing, we should probably acknowledge that they are responsive. Sure, it would be better to not screw up to begin with.

However, looking around the landscape of companies today, I will take a bumbling company that screws up but at least listens to its consumers over all those companies that screw you up and keep on truckin'.

Any resemblance between that last sentence and David Zaslav is totally in your imagination.
 

That is why you read them and acknowledge you read them before you can subscribe.
That's a legal requirement that the user acknowledge. You know they don't actually care if anyone actually reads them. It's in their best interest if you don't, actually.
 

I am starting to think someone I read the other day was right when they said that WOTC might have have put out their original post as controversy to get people talking (any publicity is good publicity) so they could then step it back.
And there's nothing manipulative and deceitful about that, right? 😉
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top