Mainstream News Discovers D&D's Species Terminology Change

orcs dnd.jpg


Several mainstream news sites have discovered that Dungeons & Dragons now refers to a character's species instead of race. The New York Times ended 2024 with a profile on Dungeons & Dragons, with a specific focus on the 2024 Player's Handbook's changes on character creation, the in-game terminology change from race to species, and the removal of Ability Score Increases tied to a character's species. The article included quotes by Robert J. Kuntz and John Stavropoulos and also referenced Elon Musk's outrage over Jason Tondro's forward in The Making of Original Dungeons & Dragons.

The piece sparked additional commentary on a variety of sites, including Fox News and The Telegraph, most of which focused on how the changes were "woke." Around the same time, Wargamer.com published a more nuanced piece about the presentation of orcs in the 2024 Player's Handbook, although its headline noted that the changes were "doomed" because players would inevitably replace the orc's traditional role as aggressor against civilization with some other monstrous group whose motivations and sentience would need to be ignored in order for adventurers to properly bash their heads in.

[Update--the Guardian has joined in also, now.]

Generally speaking, the mainstream news pieces failed to address the non-"culture war" reasons for many of these changes - namely that Dungeons & Dragons has gradually evolved from a game that promoted a specific traditional fantasy story to a more generalized system meant to capture any kind of fantasy story. Although some campaign settings and stories certainly have and still do lean into traditional fantasy roles, the kinds that work well with Ability Score Increases tied to a character's species/race, many other D&D campaigns lean away from these aspects or ignore them entirely. From a pragmatic standpoint, uncoupling Ability Score Increases from species not only removes the problematic bioessentialism from the game, it also makes the game more marketable to a wider variety of players.

Of course, the timing of many of these pieces is a bit odd, given that the 2024 Player's Handbook came out months ago and Wizards of the Coast announced plans to make these changes back in 2022. It's likely that mainstream news is slow to pick up on these types of stories. However, it's a bit surprising that some intrepid reporter didn't discover these changes for four months given the increased pervasiveness of Dungeons & Dragons in mainstream culture.

We'll add that EN World has covered the D&D species/race terminology changes as they developed and looks forward to covering new developments and news about Dungeons & Dragons in 2025 and beyond.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

Why is it that when WotC makes a decision someone doesn't like it's "lazy"? Agree, disagree, I don't really care. But there is no perfect tern and "race" should have been replaced long ago.

Seems to me that calling the choice lazy is just a way to attempt to shore up their opinion as being somehow superior. 🤔

There was no perfect choice, I think it's a better option than most others.

EDIT: sort of ninja'd by @Dire Bare .
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Why is it that when WotC makes a decision someone doesn't like it's "lazy"? Agree, disagree, I don't really care. But there is no perfect tern and "race" should have been replaced long ago.

Seems to me that calling the choice lazy is just a way to attempt to shore up their opinion as being somehow superior. 🤔

There was no perfect choice, I think it's a better option than most others.

EDIT: sort of ninja'd by @Dire Bare .
Great minds think alike! ;)
 

There is no mention in the 2024 PHB that things can be lifted from earlier printings on the book wherever they differ. Backward compability has been mentionned by the company as a commercial argument, but it didn't make the printed product.
Page 38, and https://www.dndbeyond.com/sources/d...character#BackgroundsandSpeciesfromOlderBooks
Backgrounds and Species from Older Books

Backgrounds in older D&D books don’t include ability score adjustments. If you’re using a background from an older book, adjust your ability scores by increasing one score by 2 and a different one by 1, or increase three scores by 1. None of these increases can raise a score above 20.

Similarly, species in older books include ability score increases. If you’re using a species from an older book, ignore those increases and use only the ones given by your background.

Also, if the background you choose doesn’t provide a feat, you gain an Origin feat of your choice.
 

I love how folks confuse "lazy design" with "design choices I don't like".

Sigh.

There is nothing lazy about changing the term "race" to "species" in 2024 D&D . . . it's a choice. One that some don't like. Shrug.

Indeed. I don't think the choice of word is a significant part of the "game design" at all.

Game design is about the rules structures and dynamics, not so much about the names.
 





PHB 2014 had no species, only races, but it's obvious they are referring to races since I am not aware of mention of species in published material before 2024.
That's true (mostly, see below), but the idea of races being playable species was present as far back as the 2014 PHB, where the text of the "Choosing a Race" section starts with this sentence:
Player's Handbook (2014) said:
Humans are the most common people in the worlds of D&D, but they live and work alongside dwarves, elves, halflings, and countless other fantastic species. Your character belongs to one of these peoples.

In terms of published material, Dungeons & Dragons Adventurer magazine has been using the "species" terminology since issue #1, back in September 2023. Curiously, when Hachette (the publisher) did an initial trial run of four issues back in September 2022, those issues still used the old "race" terminology. Hence we know that WotC made the decision to replace "race" with "species" roughly between September 2022 and September 2023.
 

There are no rules for warforged in the 2024 books, so they're just not a thing anymore.
There are no rules for necromancers in the 2024 books, so they're just not a thing anymore.
There are no rules for artificers in the 2024 books, so they're just not a thing anymore.

We still have rules for all of them. They are the same exact rules that 2014 had. Not being updated =/= not having them anymore. The rules we have for mixed species are the exact ones we had in 2014: there are two unique PC options (currently in the depreciated PHB) and no rules for mix-your-own. At some point, we are going to get an updated warforged, an updated necromancer, an updated artificer, and updated mixed species rules. Just because we don't have the updates today doesn't mean the older versions don't still work/exist.
There is a rule for them in the 2024 rules: if something hasn’t been updated, use the 2014 rules.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top