Tonguez
A suffusion of yellow
The United Fruit Company is up there too - its the reason Banana Republics existIf I were to do a steampunk megacorp I would base it on Standard Oil.
Standard Oil - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The United Fruit Company is up there too - its the reason Banana Republics existIf I were to do a steampunk megacorp I would base it on Standard Oil.
Standard Oil - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I agree that the Dragonmarked Houses are akin to cyberpunk mega corps (I have used them that way myself). I vehemently disagree with categorizing Eberron as Steampunk. It is magitech and aetherpunk.Eberron's dragonmarked houses aren't a bad example if you want to get megacorp-ish in your Steampunk setting. They do still have at least some government / nobility ties in most cases and mostly aren't as overtly amoral as your standard corp, but they're nevertheless up for some shady stuff under the right circumstances.
No argument from me there.I agree that the Dragonmarked Houses are akin to cyberpunk mega corps (I have used them that way myself). I vehemently disagree with categorizing Eberron as Steampunk. It is magitech and aetherpunk.
The true defining feature of cyberpunk (of which steampunk is basically a subgenre according to Jeter) is that it is about technoshock.
I haven’t seen much Chinese cyberpunk fiction, maybe living 996 in Chongqing is basically too cyberpunk already; you don’t have to read about it.
I would argue that is just future dystopia. That's a different genre (or maybe an umbrella genre that encompasses cyberpunk). 1984 is not cyberpunk, which is essentially what you are arguing.In a word, no. At least, I disagree with that sentiment.
Once a thing is big enough to call a "genre", there are enough varying examples that you won't find a single "defining feature". Genres are based on collections of tropes and themes, not single definitional themes. IMHO, at least.
One can do, for example, a cyberpunk dystopia in which the technology, or most intents and purposes, has plateaued - the society has reached a sort of steady state, and it is no longer about the change in tech, but the impact of corporate oligarchical control of tech, and the wealth disparities that comes from it.
I would argue that is just future dystopia. That's a different genre (or maybe an umbrella genre that encompasses cyberpunk). 1984 is not cyberpunk, which is essentially what you are arguing.
Wait, I thought the argument was that cyberpunk was bigger than just one trope.No, 1984 isn't cyberpunk, because it is talking about governmental control, not corporate power.
True, though Standard Oil is also colonialist in China:The United Fruit Company is up there too - its the reason Banana Republics exist