Best practices for easy-to-run modules [+]

Sacrosanct said:

Here are some quick images I threw together based on some of the feedback. Don't pay that much attention to the actual "adventure" (plot, railroad, etc.) but more on how it's laid out.

View attachment 422679
View attachment 422680
View attachment 422681
View attachment 422682

Click to expand...

Great idea to put the DC of locked doors directly on the map. I wasn't confused at all because I read the map's key.

The Overview section of Abode reminded me of a metaphor that I haven't used before now. It would be great if sections like "Overview" were written like director's commentary on a DVD. I'd go further and say RPG scenarios should be written in "DVD commentary voice" as much as they can. Not every word of every section, but it should be the majority of the text.

"DVD director commentary" captures the right tone and relationship between the designer and GM. I'm taking liberties with the actual text that Sacrosanct provided, but imagine an Overview section written more like this:

"This small stone fort contains three combat encounters (two Medium difficulty, one Hard). There's a total of 2,000 monster XP and 1,500 gold XP available including a Ring of Feather Fall and a scroll with Fireball and Mirror Image. Keep an eye on whether the players connect with one of two big clues placed here: the Letter from the Bishop and the murals depicting the True Heir. The fort should feel foreboding. If anyone fails a Perception check, give them disadvantage on future Perception checks until they leave the fort."

EDIT: This alternate Overview text isn't a narrative overview; it's a game overview.

Lanefan said:

I'm assuming you cut off the part of the map where it says how big the squares are and which way is north; if you didn't, that's another glaring omission on the part of the mapmaker.

Click to expand...

This is such a weird criticism. The point of sharing that image was not to suggest that it's a perfect map in every imaginable way, but just to show how an isometric map could be evocative and fun to use. To complain about a lack of a compass rose just...well, it smacks of desperation to find something to criticize.

I don't even know what the source is, I just Googled "hand drawn isometric dungeon map." I mean, there’s no area numbers, either, so clearly it's not complete. It could have been a player version of a map, or part of a tutorial on drawing isometric maps, or maybe nothing whatsoever to do with RPGs.

FFS.

EpicureanDM said:

"This small stone fort contains three combat encounters (two Medium difficulty, one Hard). There's a total of 2,000 monster XP and 1,500 gold XP available including a Ring of Feather Fall and a scroll with Fireball and Mirror Image. Keep an eye on whether the players connect with one of two big clues placed here: the Letter from the Bishop and the murals depicting the True Heir. The fort should feel foreboding. If anyone fails a Perception check, give them disadvantage on future Perception checks until they leave the fort."

EDIT: This alternate Overview text isn't a narrative overview; it's a game overview.

Click to expand...

This is great. I think we’re all conditioned to the idea that a module has to be focused on the “internal” of the game world and scenario. But of course it’s for the GM and an “external” view that speaks directly to what they need is a breath of fresh air.

Truename said:

This is great. I think we’re all conditioned to the idea that a module has to be focused on the “internal” of the game world and scenario. But of course it’s for the GM and an “external” view that speaks directly to what they need is a breath of fresh air.

Click to expand...

While not all of Trophy: Gold's organization is amazing, I like how many of the Incursions (its version of a dungeon scenario thing) emphasize general tone and considerations up front in a tone speaking directly to the GM:

This incursion includes imagery and motifs associated with literal harvests, such as farms, fields, a grain mill, the act of eating, crows, and so forth. It also uses harvest as a metaphor for birth. When running this incursion, emphasize the pastoral landscape (now overgrown); dwell on details bathed in traditional harvest colors (golds, oranges, deep purples); and make sure the tools of harvest are always at-hand (sickles, scythes, burlap sacks).

Click to expand...

Or

Much of this incursion takes place underground, but even so, the heavens above should figure prominently: the stars, the planets, the night sky. Things should twinkle and glimmer, and there should be pinpricks of light in the darkness. Emphasize stillness, as if floating through a void, and silence. Characters should ramble about the heavens, about planetary alignments. If you need motifs, focus on stars and planets: swords with pommels shaped like ringed planets, murals decorated with constellations, treasures shaped like zodiac signs, etc. Put starry things both above the treasure-hunters’ heads and below their feet.

Click to expand...

zakael19 said:

While not all of Trophy: Gold's organization is amazing, I like how many of the Incursions (its version of a dungeon scenario thing) emphasize general tone and considerations up front in a tone speaking directly to the GM:



Or

Click to expand...

Yeah, this is the right idea. (I'd still like to see more game-talk in it, but my memory of Trophy suggests there's not much to the rules.)

I may have said earlier in the thread that scenario designers should share their design outlines with the GM. This sort of thing is what I mean. You can imagine those two excerpts as things that the designer would have written to themselves before they wrote the "proper" text of a scenario. It's like the designer's talking to themselves in a way. But it also makes plain their intent. They give plenty of examples and key words that a GM can latch onto, which is good, too.

RPG scenario presentation would improve tremendously if designers had to write most of it in the second person.

Made some useability changes (ignore the golem image placement overlap)

Bill Zebub said:

This is such a weird criticism. The point of sharing that image was not to suggest that it's a perfect map in every imaginable way, but just to show how an isometric map could be evocative and fun to use. To complain about a lack of a compass rose just...well, it smacks of desperation to find something to criticize.

Click to expand...

No, it's merely one more criticism in a list of them, as shown in the post you quoted.

Bill Zebub said:

I don't even know what the source is, I just Googled "hand drawn isometric dungeon map." I mean, there’s no area numbers, either, so clearly it's not complete. It could have been a player version of a map, or part of a tutorial on drawing isometric maps, or maybe nothing whatsoever to do with RPGs.

Click to expand...

Then perhaps not the best example to pull out?

Sacrosanct said:

Made some useability changes (ignore the golem image placement overlap)

View attachment 422724
View attachment 422725

Click to expand...

Nitpicks to an otherwise good presentation:

Xp for the golems should be listed with the monster write-up. Just saying 2200 xp for the whole scenario isn't granular enough, as for example it's always possible the PCs will for some reason never meet Za'Gatul (maybe they defeat the golems, take the treasure, and leave before Z'G is able to react to their presence; or they get through without ever meeting the rot grubs, or ...).

There's no scale. Yes the map has squares but the room dimensions aren't given in the write-ups nor is the square size mentioned.

Personal peeve: the number of golems should be locked in without regard for how many or what composition of PCs arrives there.

Ahem. (Edit: referring to two posts back.)

overgeeked said:

The [+] is to keep things positive

Click to expand...