Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
“What if…” (combat idea)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fanaelialae" data-source="post: 8865981" data-attributes="member: 53980"><p>I like that's it's AC/DC. Rock on!</p><p></p><p>That said, I feel like this weakens martial characters without adding much in the way of interesting choices. </p><p></p><p>Best case scenario, the martial is capable of both attacks. They either intuit the best one to attack or try both to determine the best. After that, they just stick with the best one. You basically end up with a golf bag fighter.</p><p></p><p>Worst case, they only have access to one of the two and are therefore less effective against half the foes they face. Maybe they're more effective against the other half? However, you probably don't want to go too much more effective than normal because of characters based on the best case scenario (otherwise, those characters are simply have that much easier a time than the default). However, if it's not effective enough, most players will probably just ignore it and use whichever type they prefer.</p><p></p><p>In 4e, there were four defenses so it wasn't anywhere as easy to target the weak defense. Also, the targeted defense was determined by the power you used, as opposed to the weapon you wielded, so it wasn't quite so straightforward a choice even if you did know the low defense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fanaelialae, post: 8865981, member: 53980"] I like that's it's AC/DC. Rock on! That said, I feel like this weakens martial characters without adding much in the way of interesting choices. Best case scenario, the martial is capable of both attacks. They either intuit the best one to attack or try both to determine the best. After that, they just stick with the best one. You basically end up with a golf bag fighter. Worst case, they only have access to one of the two and are therefore less effective against half the foes they face. Maybe they're more effective against the other half? However, you probably don't want to go too much more effective than normal because of characters based on the best case scenario (otherwise, those characters are simply have that much easier a time than the default). However, if it's not effective enough, most players will probably just ignore it and use whichever type they prefer. In 4e, there were four defenses so it wasn't anywhere as easy to target the weak defense. Also, the targeted defense was determined by the power you used, as opposed to the weapon you wielded, so it wasn't quite so straightforward a choice even if you did know the low defense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
“What if…” (combat idea)
Top