Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 6165372" data-attributes="member: 7006">The one thing I found interesting is that while the Wizard class name was changed to Mage... the Mage's tradition involving a spellbook and spell schools was called Wizardry.&nbsp; But also that other traditions exist (like Sorcery and Witchcraft).So it appears as though there's like a double layer of subclasses here.&nbsp; You have the arcane Mage with three subclass traditions-- Wizardry, Sorcery, and Witchcraft (Warlockery)... and within each of those subclass traditions will probably be individual sub-subclasses-- the wizardry spell schools, the sorcerous paths, and the witchcraft pacts I'd imagine.Dunno the reason to put wizards, sorcerers, and witches/warlocks all into a single overclass... but I presume it must just have something to do with wanting to link all the arcane classes together for some reason?&nbsp; Not sure the point of that yet... but there probably is one.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 6165372, member: 7006"] The one thing I found interesting is that while the Wizard class name was changed to Mage... the Mage's tradition involving a spellbook and spell schools was called Wizardry. But also that other traditions exist (like Sorcery and Witchcraft). So it appears as though there's like a double layer of subclasses here. You have the arcane Mage with three subclass traditions-- Wizardry, Sorcery, and Witchcraft (Warlockery)... and within each of those subclass traditions will probably be individual sub-subclasses-- the wizardry spell schools, the sorcerous paths, and the witchcraft pacts I'd imagine. Dunno the reason to put wizards, sorcerers, and witches/warlocks all into a single overclass... but I presume it must just have something to do with wanting to link all the arcane classes together for some reason? Not sure the point of that yet... but there probably is one. [/QUOTE]

Verification