Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
02/08/13 New playtest packet to released today. [Udate: PACKAGE OUT!][
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chris_Nightwing" data-source="post: 6165447" data-attributes="member: 882"><p>Hmm, now that I see the rules for attribute increases down on paper, I'm really starting to go off it. I get that it's simple, that's definitely an advantage if you play without feats, but I think it brings out the fundamental flaw in pre-3E (and to some extent 3E) abilities: what's the point in increasing some of them?</p><p></p><p>If you're a Fighter, you increase you Strength to 20, got it. Then you bump your Con. You'll still have points left to spend using standard array, so what, you increase Dex? Nah, you're in heavy armour. Int or Cha are fun but given their grand total of 3 saving throws across all spells, you're better off with Wisdom. Repeat with other classes, bump your prime requisite, then your Con. High level characters will all be surprisingly robust. I see a future math error right there - a failure to account for the fact that most characters have got another 20-40HP over the levels and monsters failing to make a dent.</p><p></p><p>Now feats, I quite like them, they're chunky. But. There's always a but. Because many of the sub-abilities *aren't* just numerical, there's a reasonable chance you've already picked it up somewhere else. I'm not sure that's a bother if it's a proficiency, but if you're an Elf, taking Alert seems.. unfortunate? Even though it's quite in theme. Same goes for Stealthy since you've almost got two parts of that.</p><p></p><p>I'd really like to see a return to the old-fashioned weapon proficiency system of yore. A bit like skill points, each step would give you a neat ability or choice thereof. If you're a bow expert, first you're proficient, then you can pick the range, cover or multiattack option for your next point, and so on. Allow no more points to be invested in a category than your attack bonus and Fighters get their advantage built in.</p><p></p><p>Seriously there are a whole bunch of things that could be combined into the same subsystem. Right now every class is all over the place with abilities and feats. It's really off-putting that there's no elegance in the design <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chris_Nightwing, post: 6165447, member: 882"] Hmm, now that I see the rules for attribute increases down on paper, I'm really starting to go off it. I get that it's simple, that's definitely an advantage if you play without feats, but I think it brings out the fundamental flaw in pre-3E (and to some extent 3E) abilities: what's the point in increasing some of them? If you're a Fighter, you increase you Strength to 20, got it. Then you bump your Con. You'll still have points left to spend using standard array, so what, you increase Dex? Nah, you're in heavy armour. Int or Cha are fun but given their grand total of 3 saving throws across all spells, you're better off with Wisdom. Repeat with other classes, bump your prime requisite, then your Con. High level characters will all be surprisingly robust. I see a future math error right there - a failure to account for the fact that most characters have got another 20-40HP over the levels and monsters failing to make a dent. Now feats, I quite like them, they're chunky. But. There's always a but. Because many of the sub-abilities *aren't* just numerical, there's a reasonable chance you've already picked it up somewhere else. I'm not sure that's a bother if it's a proficiency, but if you're an Elf, taking Alert seems.. unfortunate? Even though it's quite in theme. Same goes for Stealthy since you've almost got two parts of that. I'd really like to see a return to the old-fashioned weapon proficiency system of yore. A bit like skill points, each step would give you a neat ability or choice thereof. If you're a bow expert, first you're proficient, then you can pick the range, cover or multiattack option for your next point, and so on. Allow no more points to be invested in a category than your attack bonus and Fighters get their advantage built in. Seriously there are a whole bunch of things that could be combined into the same subsystem. Right now every class is all over the place with abilities and feats. It's really off-putting that there's no elegance in the design :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
02/08/13 New playtest packet to released today. [Udate: PACKAGE OUT!][
Top