Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kobold Avenger" data-source="post: 6165600" data-attributes="member: 779">-For spells I think that primary spellcasters should have 2 slots of each of their highest level spells at 20th level.&nbsp; The proposed spell save DC by spell level is only going to make this even more necessary.-And there's still plenty of spells that should be rituals.&nbsp; Mainly any spell with a casting time of over a minute, a lot of the divination spells, and some of the higher level utilities.-Yes I agree that brew potion and scribe scroll are off, as class features.-With Rangers I don't like now how they've basically confined the 2 favoured enemy types to a fighting style.&nbsp; I thought they were trying to do away with that.-If with the Gladiator they're trying to test subclasses that have different mechanics from the main class, then maybe they should also see about subclasses that replace a feature from the main class.&nbsp; Even if that's more of a future splatbook like thing.-The feat Tough really needs something else other than 2 hp per level, perhaps something that allows for the character to heal better.-I like how ki points, channel divinity and combat superiority are attempts at encounter abilities.&nbsp; They at least feel different from 4e's bland sameness that a lot of the AEDU turned out to be.-Tactical Warrior feat is an interesting way of bringing back the 4e fighter.-A 20th level rogue assassin can inflict crit + ability mod + 42 damage (maximized sneak attack) on a surprise attack, which has a chance to stun and may trigger a save vs. die.&nbsp; Not bad and not too overpowered against really powerful enemies, seems like a good balance on such an ability.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kobold Avenger, post: 6165600, member: 779"] -For spells I think that primary spellcasters should have 2 slots of each of their highest level spells at 20th level. The proposed spell save DC by spell level is only going to make this even more necessary. -And there's still plenty of spells that should be rituals. Mainly any spell with a casting time of over a minute, a lot of the divination spells, and some of the higher level utilities. -Yes I agree that brew potion and scribe scroll are off, as class features. -With Rangers I don't like now how they've basically confined the 2 favoured enemy types to a fighting style. I thought they were trying to do away with that. -If with the Gladiator they're trying to test subclasses that have different mechanics from the main class, then maybe they should also see about subclasses that replace a feature from the main class. Even if that's more of a future splatbook like thing. -The feat Tough really needs something else other than 2 hp per level, perhaps something that allows for the character to heal better. -I like how ki points, channel divinity and combat superiority are attempts at encounter abilities. They at least feel different from 4e's bland sameness that a lot of the AEDU turned out to be. -Tactical Warrior feat is an interesting way of bringing back the 4e fighter. -A 20th level rogue assassin can inflict crit + ability mod + 42 damage (maximized sneak attack) on a surprise attack, which has a chance to stun and may trigger a save vs. die. Not bad and not too overpowered against really powerful enemies, seems like a good balance on such an ability. [/QUOTE]

Verification