Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 6166161" data-attributes="member: 14506">I read this last night and I was not sure what it was that did not sit well. This is what it was. First of all I would want these little class features to be more like feats. Second, I want the player to opt into it feature by feature not at character generation. So meaning, since they will not be feats (they want to give feat-like class features to the fighter), the player would select the ability they want at level X from a pool of abilities. I can see a player want to select abilities from each of these sub-classes and cobble together something that they call their own... whether they be passive abilities or reactive or activated ones. Splintering off class features from feats is a step backwards, but I understand the reason why, they want to make feats optional. Instead what is happening though is they have preselected feats in sub-classes and then have an added bonus in the optional feat system. I am not seeing the benefit. When I think simple fighter I think no special little feats/features. It is all baked into the numbers where their mechanical edge comes from... Maybe that is just me though...</blockquote>