Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
1.1/Terms Signature Leak, it was a draft?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iosue" data-source="post: 8935674" data-attributes="member: 6680772"><p>See it’s getting all confused again. The “contracts” that WotC sent to be signed were specifically designated “term sheets.” That is explicitly a draft, in that even both parties are immediately happy and sign it, it only functions as a letter of intent while the legal teams hammer out the real contracts.</p><p></p><p>But what people are complaining about being called a draft is the copy of OGL 1.1 apparently sent along with the term sheets. That could only be considered as a reference document, since signing the term sheet would not mean signing the OGL. The term sheets were for licenses <em>separate</em> from the OGL. It was perforce a draft, inasmuch as it was never made public.</p><p></p><p>The only question, then, is whether the OGL 1.1 was represented to the 3PPs as a draft, or subject to change, or open to feedback, anything to indicate it was not a final version that WotC was committed to moving forward with. WotC’s statements suggest that they were seeking feedback, but we don’t know what kind of explanation that WotC gave. But, even Kyle Brink seems to think there was a break in communication that encouraged someone to leak the draft.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iosue, post: 8935674, member: 6680772"] See it’s getting all confused again. The “contracts” that WotC sent to be signed were specifically designated “term sheets.” That is explicitly a draft, in that even both parties are immediately happy and sign it, it only functions as a letter of intent while the legal teams hammer out the real contracts. But what people are complaining about being called a draft is the copy of OGL 1.1 apparently sent along with the term sheets. That could only be considered as a reference document, since signing the term sheet would not mean signing the OGL. The term sheets were for licenses [I]separate[/I] from the OGL. It was perforce a draft, inasmuch as it was never made public. The only question, then, is whether the OGL 1.1 was represented to the 3PPs as a draft, or subject to change, or open to feedback, anything to indicate it was not a final version that WotC was committed to moving forward with. WotC’s statements suggest that they were seeking feedback, but we don’t know what kind of explanation that WotC gave. But, even Kyle Brink seems to think there was a break in communication that encouraged someone to leak the draft. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
1.1/Terms Signature Leak, it was a draft?
Top