Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ForceUser" data-source="post: 909271" data-attributes="member: 2785">Heh, easy there fella. We obviously have different play styles; I don't begrudge you yours, I'd appreciate the same consideration <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />My DM runs a high-fantasy Greyhawk game oozing with powerful dragons, demons, devils, giants, axiomatic half-celestial dire lions, etc etc...combat is fierce, deadly, and plentiful.  As powerful as my character is, he is still only the 2nd or 3rd-most powerful person in the player group. I like to kick butt and do cool stuff, and healing is a nice fringe benefit, but is not the reason I played the cleric. In a game of high adventure, a good healer is almost required, and nobody else was going to play one. So I did - reluctantly at first - and soon after I discovered that it wasn't all bad; with the right feats and spell selection a cleric is every bit as exciting to play as a fighter or a wizard. What I'm saying is that IF the revisions take that away from me, then I'll want to retire the heal dispenser in favor of something more exciting.</blockquote>