Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="reapersaurus" data-source="post: 14064" data-attributes="member: 1194">Re: Re: Re: RANT warning!You can think whatever you want.You can have your opinions.You can even wrongly interpret my points to say &quot;A fighter is useless now&quot; or &quot;A rogue will out-damage a fighter all times.&quot;I have REPEATEDLY stated this:In my opinion, a rogue is TOO DAMNED GOOD AT COMBAT.NOT better than a fighter.Not more dangerous than a mage.A fighter still has a place in a campaign, no doubt.BUT.Keeping in mind that YES, a rogue IS a skills-character, (Why else would they get over twice as many skills than the average class?) they are WAY too good at dealing damage.If you guys want to enter the world of true comparisons, why don;t you try to equip a fighter-type with as much gear and feats as you can, and TRY to keep up with the rogue in EVERY realm of gaming OTHER than combat.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="reapersaurus, post: 14064, member: 1194"] [b]Re: Re: Re: RANT warning![/b] You can think whatever you want. You can have your opinions. You can even wrongly interpret my points to say "A fighter is useless now" or "A rogue will out-damage a fighter all times." I have REPEATEDLY stated this: In my opinion, a rogue is TOO DAMNED GOOD AT COMBAT. NOT better than a fighter. Not more dangerous than a mage. A fighter still has a place in a campaign, no doubt. BUT. Keeping in mind that YES, a rogue IS a skills-character, (Why else would they get over twice as many skills than the average class?) they are WAY too good at dealing damage. If you guys want to enter the world of true comparisons, why don;t you try to equip a fighter-type with as much gear and feats as you can, and TRY to keep up with the rogue in EVERY realm of gaming OTHER than combat. [/QUOTE]

Verification