Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fanboy2000" data-source="post: 1698179" data-attributes="member: 19998">3e RevisedThe only thing I hate about 3.5 is the name. Why couldn't they called 3rd Edition Revised? Ugh.I like the tweeks. Some classes needed an overhaul, and the combat chapter sorely needed to be re-written in English.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Actually, I think that Eberron will slow the march to 4th Edtion. The last thing WotC would want to do is re-write the highly sucessful campaign setting for a new edition. One of Eberron's main selling points is that it was written for the current edition (I think that's why Eberron came after 3.5, indeed, it may be why 3.5 came as soon as it did), if you release a new edition, you eliminate that selling point and Eberron joins the ranks of Grehawk and Forgotten Realms, good, but not as great as it was in the &quot;old days.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fanboy2000, post: 1698179, member: 19998"] [b]3e Revised[/b] The only thing I hate about 3.5 is the name. Why couldn't they called 3rd Edition Revised? Ugh. I like the tweeks. Some classes needed an overhaul, and the combat chapter sorely needed to be re-written in English. ;) Actually, I think that Eberron will slow the march to 4th Edtion. The last thing WotC would want to do is re-write the highly sucessful campaign setting for a new edition. One of Eberron's main selling points is that it was written for the current edition (I think that's why Eberron came after 3.5, indeed, it may be why 3.5 came as soon as it did), if you release a new edition, you eliminate that selling point and Eberron joins the ranks of Grehawk and Forgotten Realms, good, but not as great as it was in the "old days." [/QUOTE]

Verification