Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
10% of brain = 100% stupid
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="apoptosis" data-source="post: 4637740" data-attributes="member: 3226"><p>I will preface this with i am a neurochemist in drug development and while i am very wrong on many things, i do know this subject matter pretty well. </p><p></p><p>Honestly the 10% is a myth. </p><p></p><p>Though it is a myth that did originate from some unusual phenomena that we have observed (certain developmental disorders, cases of brain damaged patients etc.). Heck depending on the phenomena the 10% could be 5% or 20% etc.</p><p></p><p>The brain is remarkably plastic and contrary to popular belief you do grow neurons even in adulthood. It also has a large number of compensatory adaptive advantages that allow the brain to rewire itself after damage.</p><p></p><p>If you look at any PET or fMRI you will see that they entire brain is used quite often. Accumulated evidence leaves no doubt that most all of the brain is used.</p><p></p><p>Every so often a neurobiology article will come out using this myth as a bit of a joke as an intro to the article but it is really a myth.</p><p></p><p>Others are free to disagree but that is the consensus of the experts in neurobiology. It is one of the most frustrating myths in neurobiology as it wont seem to die. The other is the blown out of proportion idea of left vs right brain activities (most all activities use s synthesis of both sides)</p><p></p><p>While at one time maybe the claim could be used without looking very foolish that is no longer true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="apoptosis, post: 4637740, member: 3226"] I will preface this with i am a neurochemist in drug development and while i am very wrong on many things, i do know this subject matter pretty well. Honestly the 10% is a myth. Though it is a myth that did originate from some unusual phenomena that we have observed (certain developmental disorders, cases of brain damaged patients etc.). Heck depending on the phenomena the 10% could be 5% or 20% etc. The brain is remarkably plastic and contrary to popular belief you do grow neurons even in adulthood. It also has a large number of compensatory adaptive advantages that allow the brain to rewire itself after damage. If you look at any PET or fMRI you will see that they entire brain is used quite often. Accumulated evidence leaves no doubt that most all of the brain is used. Every so often a neurobiology article will come out using this myth as a bit of a joke as an intro to the article but it is really a myth. Others are free to disagree but that is the consensus of the experts in neurobiology. It is one of the most frustrating myths in neurobiology as it wont seem to die. The other is the blown out of proportion idea of left vs right brain activities (most all activities use s synthesis of both sides) While at one time maybe the claim could be used without looking very foolish that is no longer true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
10% of brain = 100% stupid
Top