Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
101 roleplaying descriptions justifying martial dailies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="N0Man" data-source="post: 4819893" data-attributes="member: 64066"><p>That example is kind of silly in that you are not even giving the example fluff that would be in an official power, and then asking if we're satisfied with the non-existent fluff.</p><p></p><p>However, it does bring up an interesting point.</p><p></p><p>There have been tons of examples here of how to provide fluff to explain martial powers. I don't like most of them, but there are some that are at least acceptable.</p><p></p><p>So, what should I accept, since WotC did not explicitly tell me how I should flavor their entire resource system?</p><p></p><p>I think that the answer is strongly implied throughout the PHB and DMG. The answer is... whatever you want. They designed a game system that is intentionally fluff-lite, or more to the point, fluff-flexible.</p><p></p><p>The detractors appear to miss this, but yet this is one of the traits that many of the fans wholeheartedly embrace. However, it's a real paradigm shift from previous editions, and I think that's really a big part of the resistance.</p><p></p><p>Old editions designed the fluff and then tried to come up with rules to support the fluff. 4E tries to come up with core system with logical and balanced mechanics, and then comes up with fluff-lite powers within that framework.</p><p></p><p>Some people are made very uncomfortable with this. Admittedly, at first I was apprehensive too. What really won me over though was the realization that by making fluff less important, than it completely frees me to make whatever fluff I want!</p><p></p><p>That's the strength of 4E. If I want my martial powers to be without explanations, that's fine. If I want it to be about fate and luck, that's fine. If I want it to be about being guided about my ancient warrior ancestor that's fine too.</p><p></p><p>The beauty of this is that NONE of this is a houserule! The existing rules not only support reflavoring, but frequently encourage it.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I look at the major objection in this thread to be confusing. I don't understand why an official fluff justification is really preferrable to having the freedom to choose whatever fluff I want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="N0Man, post: 4819893, member: 64066"] That example is kind of silly in that you are not even giving the example fluff that would be in an official power, and then asking if we're satisfied with the non-existent fluff. However, it does bring up an interesting point. There have been tons of examples here of how to provide fluff to explain martial powers. I don't like most of them, but there are some that are at least acceptable. So, what should I accept, since WotC did not explicitly tell me how I should flavor their entire resource system? I think that the answer is strongly implied throughout the PHB and DMG. The answer is... whatever you want. They designed a game system that is intentionally fluff-lite, or more to the point, fluff-flexible. The detractors appear to miss this, but yet this is one of the traits that many of the fans wholeheartedly embrace. However, it's a real paradigm shift from previous editions, and I think that's really a big part of the resistance. Old editions designed the fluff and then tried to come up with rules to support the fluff. 4E tries to come up with core system with logical and balanced mechanics, and then comes up with fluff-lite powers within that framework. Some people are made very uncomfortable with this. Admittedly, at first I was apprehensive too. What really won me over though was the realization that by making fluff less important, than it completely frees me to make whatever fluff I want! That's the strength of 4E. If I want my martial powers to be without explanations, that's fine. If I want it to be about fate and luck, that's fine. If I want it to be about being guided about my ancient warrior ancestor that's fine too. The beauty of this is that NONE of this is a houserule! The existing rules not only support reflavoring, but frequently encourage it. Personally, I look at the major objection in this thread to be confusing. I don't understand why an official fluff justification is really preferrable to having the freedom to choose whatever fluff I want. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
101 roleplaying descriptions justifying martial dailies
Top