Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DM-Rocco" data-source="post: 4445072" data-attributes="member: 14451">Then I'm not sure what you are complaining about, the whole 4e core set is, in spite of making some classes better, very generic.  Hell, the feat selection really blows.  Too many supplements spoils the game, but a nice balance is fine.  By dismissing everything but the core rules you have limited the game.They had to leave out those classes, instead of taking up 3 pages per class, each class not takes up 10 or more pages because of the need to add in more powers.  It is the biggest PHB in the history of D&D and it doesn't cover everything.As to having to reply on certain supplements to make certain classes more interesting, well, it goes both ways.  Wizards are interesting, an Incantrix is more so, an Arch Mage even more.  Fighters by themselves, with just the 3.5 core books, were fun to play and it was up to the player to be creative to find new uses for the feats and such.  Sorry if you never figured that out.IMO, the only difference in combat dynamics is that now, because of WOTC “balancing” the math of the game, the minions can actually hit the PCs at higher levels because it is harder to get outrageous ACs.  Other than that, they still seem to pose the same threat as the 3.5 minions.</blockquote>