Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
$125,000 in fines for D&D pirates? Help me do the math...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alzrius" data-source="post: 4967113" data-attributes="member: 8461"><p>I don't understand why people keep bringing up the point that a settlement is "negotiated between the parties." As near as I can tell, that point is raised to try and somehow assert that because the defendant(s) signed off on it, they must agree that it is an appropriate amount for them to pay in response to their actions.</p><p></p><p>I don't think this is true. If your only options are "bad" (a high settlement) and "worse" (an even higher figure as a result of losing a civil case), you take the "bad" option, but that doesn't mean you agree it's what should happen.</p><p></p><p>If it is clear to both WotC and the defendants that WotC will win the case, and there's a good estimate of what the damages will be, then WotC can effectively set any settlement figure they want that's less than the estimated damages, and there's little negotiation that the defendants can do; when the other guy has all the cards, you can bargain exactly as much as the other guy wants to bargain, and that's it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm honestly not sure why you're bringing these points up. I haven't called this a fine, nor tried to use it to reverse-engineer WotC's lost profits. Others have, and others have responded to those points.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I said it wasn't the best analogy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think this is an overestimation of the position these defendants found themselves in. If you're too poor to afford a lawyer, then you likely won't even know you have these options, let alone know how to pursue them.</p><p></p><p>And even if you have a lawyer, I doubt it makes much of a difference if the plaintiff has that much leverage. Yes, you can slow the process down, but a speed bump is still just a speed bump, and doesn't seriously impact the plaintiff - for example, the settlements here include the defendants paying WotC's legal fees, in addition to paying damages. </p><p></p><p>That means that even if they dragged the civil suit out, it doesn't cost WotC more money, since they're just passing the cost on as part of the settlement (or, had they taken it to its conclusion, as part of the judgment in WotC's favor). Moreover, the defendants then increase the amount of money they have to pay their own lawyer for the time used pursuing these stalling tactics. In other words, the "great deal of trouble" they can dredge up amounts to little more than cutting off their nose to spite their face. If they can't win the case, there's little good that a delaying tactic will do when the opposition knows it will win, and can make you pay its costs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alzrius, post: 4967113, member: 8461"] I don't understand why people keep bringing up the point that a settlement is "negotiated between the parties." As near as I can tell, that point is raised to try and somehow assert that because the defendant(s) signed off on it, they must agree that it is an appropriate amount for them to pay in response to their actions. I don't think this is true. If your only options are "bad" (a high settlement) and "worse" (an even higher figure as a result of losing a civil case), you take the "bad" option, but that doesn't mean you agree it's what should happen. If it is clear to both WotC and the defendants that WotC will win the case, and there's a good estimate of what the damages will be, then WotC can effectively set any settlement figure they want that's less than the estimated damages, and there's little negotiation that the defendants can do; when the other guy has all the cards, you can bargain exactly as much as the other guy wants to bargain, and that's it. I'm honestly not sure why you're bringing these points up. I haven't called this a fine, nor tried to use it to reverse-engineer WotC's lost profits. Others have, and others have responded to those points. I said it wasn't the best analogy. I think this is an overestimation of the position these defendants found themselves in. If you're too poor to afford a lawyer, then you likely won't even know you have these options, let alone know how to pursue them. And even if you have a lawyer, I doubt it makes much of a difference if the plaintiff has that much leverage. Yes, you can slow the process down, but a speed bump is still just a speed bump, and doesn't seriously impact the plaintiff - for example, the settlements here include the defendants paying WotC's legal fees, in addition to paying damages. That means that even if they dragged the civil suit out, it doesn't cost WotC more money, since they're just passing the cost on as part of the settlement (or, had they taken it to its conclusion, as part of the judgment in WotC's favor). Moreover, the defendants then increase the amount of money they have to pay their own lawyer for the time used pursuing these stalling tactics. In other words, the "great deal of trouble" they can dredge up amounts to little more than cutting off their nose to spite their face. If they can't win the case, there's little good that a delaying tactic will do when the opposition knows it will win, and can make you pay its costs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
$125,000 in fines for D&D pirates? Help me do the math...
Top