Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
$125,000 in fines for D&D pirates? Help me do the math...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 4967559" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>Lots of little rambling thoughts and questions here...</p><p></p><p>First off, all the discussion has been about *US* laws; are all those being prosecuted in or from the US? And if not, how do the laws of their home countries affect any of this?</p><p></p><p>In the case of speeding, the obvious answer is to change the law to reflect reality.</p><p>Or, again, change both the law and perception. My admittedly rather impractical suggestion goes something like this:</p><p></p><p>1. As the owner of a given piece of IP, at the time I release it for public consumption I get to declare whether or not it may be digitized, including by me. If I declare that it may be, or if I digitize it myself, then it's open season and I'm accepting that people are going to share it whether I want them to or not; though I still retain the right to sell the IP in both digital and non-digital forms. But if I declare that it may not be digitized, and agree that I will never digitize it myself, then it may not be digitized or stored on *any* digital medium. Period. And once made, this decision is irrevocable.</p><p></p><p>2. The laws have to be changed to reflect the above, including standard pre-set punishments for violation (I suggest automatic forfeit of any equipment found to contain IP declared as non-digital, for a start) and means to search for such.</p><p></p><p>Yes, utterly impractical, I know...but I stand behind the general idea, that the IP owner has the right to determine what "level" of sharing s/he is willing to accept (and that determination being made in part by what means the IP is produced and-or sold), and the laws reflect and back up that determination.</p><p></p><p>So, if I release some music on non-digital formats only (vinyl and tape, perhaps) and declare it non-digital, I should be able to expect the law to punish anyone found to have that music stored in any digital format. (yes, this means the idea of making mp3's for personal use goes out the window; but that's the root of the whole problem: once something gets digitized once, it's open season - there is no such thing as internet security...) Ditto for books being turned to pdf's. But note this limits me as the IP owner as well; by my own declaration I cannot store the music on a CD...</p><p></p><p>Same goes for a painting - if it's declared non-digital, it cannot be displayed online in any form.</p><p></p><p>This falls apart, of course, when the production medium *is* digital, e.g. computer art. I've no idea how to handle that one in any kind of black-and-white method.</p><p></p><p>Lanefan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 4967559, member: 29398"] Lots of little rambling thoughts and questions here... First off, all the discussion has been about *US* laws; are all those being prosecuted in or from the US? And if not, how do the laws of their home countries affect any of this? In the case of speeding, the obvious answer is to change the law to reflect reality. Or, again, change both the law and perception. My admittedly rather impractical suggestion goes something like this: 1. As the owner of a given piece of IP, at the time I release it for public consumption I get to declare whether or not it may be digitized, including by me. If I declare that it may be, or if I digitize it myself, then it's open season and I'm accepting that people are going to share it whether I want them to or not; though I still retain the right to sell the IP in both digital and non-digital forms. But if I declare that it may not be digitized, and agree that I will never digitize it myself, then it may not be digitized or stored on *any* digital medium. Period. And once made, this decision is irrevocable. 2. The laws have to be changed to reflect the above, including standard pre-set punishments for violation (I suggest automatic forfeit of any equipment found to contain IP declared as non-digital, for a start) and means to search for such. Yes, utterly impractical, I know...but I stand behind the general idea, that the IP owner has the right to determine what "level" of sharing s/he is willing to accept (and that determination being made in part by what means the IP is produced and-or sold), and the laws reflect and back up that determination. So, if I release some music on non-digital formats only (vinyl and tape, perhaps) and declare it non-digital, I should be able to expect the law to punish anyone found to have that music stored in any digital format. (yes, this means the idea of making mp3's for personal use goes out the window; but that's the root of the whole problem: once something gets digitized once, it's open season - there is no such thing as internet security...) Ditto for books being turned to pdf's. But note this limits me as the IP owner as well; by my own declaration I cannot store the music on a CD... Same goes for a painting - if it's declared non-digital, it cannot be displayed online in any form. This falls apart, of course, when the production medium *is* digital, e.g. computer art. I've no idea how to handle that one in any kind of black-and-white method. Lanefan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
$125,000 in fines for D&D pirates? Help me do the math...
Top