Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
15 Minute Adventuring Day
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aegeri" data-source="post: 5503857" data-attributes="member: 78116"><p>Heroic monsters actually have much better design as well - power wise. If you think the MV Displacer Beast is bad, you've obviously not seen an encounter with anything that immobilizes and storm shards (MM2). Storm shards do something like 1d6+6 damage and if you fail to move 4 squares on your turn, you take an additional 3d6+6 damage.</p><p></p><p>Did I mention they are level 4 artillery? Did I mention they are Monster Manual 2 and therefore nowhere near the update? </p><p></p><p>As for power creep, I can't help but laugh at that because I bet you didn't see a party that was the original (unerrataed) versions of things like the Warlord (Whoring Quickening Order and Relentless Assault), a orb Wizard Bloodmage, a Infernal Warlock multiclass Wizard with... BLOODMAGE, a Cleric whoring Righteous Smite (for the Warlord to hit with Lead the Attack) and a Daggermaster Rogue. I mean that right there is a party that slaughtered Dagon in 2 rounds. <em>Two</em> rounds. Why? Because put simply it couldn't be challenged with monsters at the time, blowing through all encounters with simple at-wills/encounters (minding the Bloodmages were both Archmages, if you know how that ED works you'll know what happened constantly).</p><p></p><p>That party is more powerful than anything that has come after it. Easily. In fact, that entire party has been nerfed by errata in one way or another in multiple places. There is a good reason for that.</p><p></p><p>I am not disagreeing with this, I am just pointing out this is the way things probably should have been. Aggressive fast combats and not huge grinds against monsters that - quite frankly - might as well not have been there in the first place.</p><p></p><p>I agree, but with the caveat that grinding out ineffectual monsters with a billion HP for six rounds is boring. An intense 3-4 round battle that leaves the PCs badly bloodied and injured - but was exciting from round 1 and didn't lose intensity "EG the cleanup is actually just as quick" is far better.</p><p></p><p>Believe me, when you need 7+ rounds of combat to scratch PCs into bloodied, you're not having fun.</p><p></p><p>They still are. I mean I seem to be doing perfectly fine with this if you read the <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/297215-my-game-session-notes-dark-sun-eberron-gamma-world-pol.html" target="_blank">notes from my game</a>. </p><p></p><p>I 100% firmly disagree with this statement. There is no "tactical excercise" in engaging a group of creatures that will simply not be able to do *anything* to you whatsoever. The reason combats needed to go seven rounds was because the monsters would have no chance of bloodying an epic level PC without it. You had to artificially extend combat by abusing stun and dominate powers. Have you noticed with the increased damage the amount of abuse that paragon/epic monsters do with stun/dominate has disappeared? It's simply no longer required to make challenging fun combats.</p><p></p><p>No offense, but you sound like you didn't play a lot of epic pre-MM3. PCs would grind away with their at-wills ANYWAY because monsters weren't enough of a threat to bother using dailies on in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Believe me, if I got my PCs to spend dailies I was <em>pleased</em>. It meant they were actually threatened for once.</p><p></p><p>I basically disagree with everything you wrote. I don't know how much epic pre-MM3 you played, but it was full of boring grinding combats that required immense preparation time and - hell I'll outright say it - just abusing monsters ability to chain stun/daze/dominate to be challenging. Having to deny a player their turn consistently every round so the monsters had enough time to scratch down their HP was absolutely horrible.</p><p></p><p>Nothing tactical about it either, because the PCs had won from the get go and no matter what damage was done - nothing ever felt like it mattered. Epic combat felt like a boring grindy thing you just did to get to the next level. To fight more of the same ineffectual enemies full of HP.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/280134-running-epic-tier-campaigns.html" target="_blank">I've wrote about my experiences with epic tier both pre and post MM3</a>. I would <em>never ever</em> go back to pre-MM3 damage/power design if you paid me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aegeri, post: 5503857, member: 78116"] Heroic monsters actually have much better design as well - power wise. If you think the MV Displacer Beast is bad, you've obviously not seen an encounter with anything that immobilizes and storm shards (MM2). Storm shards do something like 1d6+6 damage and if you fail to move 4 squares on your turn, you take an additional 3d6+6 damage. Did I mention they are level 4 artillery? Did I mention they are Monster Manual 2 and therefore nowhere near the update? As for power creep, I can't help but laugh at that because I bet you didn't see a party that was the original (unerrataed) versions of things like the Warlord (Whoring Quickening Order and Relentless Assault), a orb Wizard Bloodmage, a Infernal Warlock multiclass Wizard with... BLOODMAGE, a Cleric whoring Righteous Smite (for the Warlord to hit with Lead the Attack) and a Daggermaster Rogue. I mean that right there is a party that slaughtered Dagon in 2 rounds. [i]Two[/i] rounds. Why? Because put simply it couldn't be challenged with monsters at the time, blowing through all encounters with simple at-wills/encounters (minding the Bloodmages were both Archmages, if you know how that ED works you'll know what happened constantly). That party is more powerful than anything that has come after it. Easily. In fact, that entire party has been nerfed by errata in one way or another in multiple places. There is a good reason for that. I am not disagreeing with this, I am just pointing out this is the way things probably should have been. Aggressive fast combats and not huge grinds against monsters that - quite frankly - might as well not have been there in the first place. I agree, but with the caveat that grinding out ineffectual monsters with a billion HP for six rounds is boring. An intense 3-4 round battle that leaves the PCs badly bloodied and injured - but was exciting from round 1 and didn't lose intensity "EG the cleanup is actually just as quick" is far better. Believe me, when you need 7+ rounds of combat to scratch PCs into bloodied, you're not having fun. They still are. I mean I seem to be doing perfectly fine with this if you read the [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/297215-my-game-session-notes-dark-sun-eberron-gamma-world-pol.html"]notes from my game[/URL]. I 100% firmly disagree with this statement. There is no "tactical excercise" in engaging a group of creatures that will simply not be able to do *anything* to you whatsoever. The reason combats needed to go seven rounds was because the monsters would have no chance of bloodying an epic level PC without it. You had to artificially extend combat by abusing stun and dominate powers. Have you noticed with the increased damage the amount of abuse that paragon/epic monsters do with stun/dominate has disappeared? It's simply no longer required to make challenging fun combats. No offense, but you sound like you didn't play a lot of epic pre-MM3. PCs would grind away with their at-wills ANYWAY because monsters weren't enough of a threat to bother using dailies on in the first place. Believe me, if I got my PCs to spend dailies I was [I]pleased[/I]. It meant they were actually threatened for once. I basically disagree with everything you wrote. I don't know how much epic pre-MM3 you played, but it was full of boring grinding combats that required immense preparation time and - hell I'll outright say it - just abusing monsters ability to chain stun/daze/dominate to be challenging. Having to deny a player their turn consistently every round so the monsters had enough time to scratch down their HP was absolutely horrible. Nothing tactical about it either, because the PCs had won from the get go and no matter what damage was done - nothing ever felt like it mattered. Epic combat felt like a boring grindy thing you just did to get to the next level. To fight more of the same ineffectual enemies full of HP. [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/4e-discussion/280134-running-epic-tier-campaigns.html"]I've wrote about my experiences with epic tier both pre and post MM3[/URL]. I would [I]never ever[/I] go back to pre-MM3 damage/power design if you paid me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
15 Minute Adventuring Day
Top