Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Faolyn" data-source="post: 8275611" data-attributes="member: 6915329">The claim:OK, now as some who read the main DS setting book and the MCs for it, but otherwise knows very little about the setting (and nothing from the novels): yes, it would be cool to have more of the world be explored. Especially if those regions are sufficiently different from Tyr (while still keeping in the Dark Sun milieu) to be notably interesting. It wouldn't really be worth it if was just &quot;Tyr, but by the Sea of Silt.&quot; Whether it follows from 4e or not, I don't care--as I said, my knowledge of DS is limited. And I have no idea how much DS fans liked what they did in 4e, or even paid attention to it (I know they did some Ravenloft stuff, but since I didn't play 4e, I ignored that; I imagine that some DS fans would also do the same). I've heard that many didn't like what they did back in 2e when they produced some revised or expanded edition.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Faolyn, post: 8275611, member: 6915329"] The claim: OK, now as some who read the main DS setting book and the MCs for it, but otherwise knows very little about the setting (and nothing from the novels): yes, it would be cool to have more of the world be explored. [I]Especially [/I]if those regions are sufficiently different from Tyr (while still keeping in the Dark Sun milieu) to be notably interesting. It wouldn't really be worth it if was just "Tyr, but by the Sea of Silt." Whether it follows from 4e or not, I don't care--as I said, my knowledge of DS is limited. And I have no idea how much DS fans liked what they did in 4e, or even paid attention to it (I know they did some Ravenloft stuff, but since I didn't play 4e, I ignored that; I imagine that some DS fans would also do the same). I've heard that many didn't like what they did back in 2e when they produced some revised or expanded edition. [/QUOTE]

Verification