Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RFisher" data-source="post: 3460860" data-attributes="member: 3608">Only if you allowed it to be boring. I'll say it again: A MU who has spent his daily allotment of spells is only useless if his player is useless. (^_^)...but I do agree with many of your other comments.Seeing as you've already gotten the obvious answer: You can find barbarians &amp; cavaliers in the PHB. Fighter is the typical heading, but they can also be found under Cleric, Paladin, Ranger, or even Thief. (^_^)Priests (IMnsHO) in 1e are usually NPCs &amp; don't go adventuring. I believe you can find some ideas for specializing the (poorly named) Cleric class by deity in the Greyhawk boxed set.If using the UA Cavalier class, I suggest allowing both (PHB) Fighter-Paladins &amp; (UA) Cavalier-Paladins. Treat them as separate classes.Amen! Preach it, brother Celebrim! I cannot agree more with this. Add my 20+ years of gaming experience to that.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RFisher, post: 3460860, member: 3608"] Only if you allowed it to be boring. I'll say it again: A MU who has spent his daily allotment of spells is only useless if his player is useless. (^_^) ...but I do agree with many of your other comments. Seeing as you've already gotten the obvious answer: You can find barbarians & cavaliers in the PHB. Fighter is the typical heading, but they can also be found under Cleric, Paladin, Ranger, or even Thief. (^_^) Priests (IMnsHO) in 1e are usually NPCs & don't go adventuring. I believe you can find some ideas for specializing the (poorly named) Cleric class by deity in the Greyhawk boxed set. If using the UA Cavalier class, I suggest allowing both (PHB) Fighter-Paladins & (UA) Cavalier-Paladins. Treat them as separate classes. Amen! Preach it, brother Celebrim! I cannot agree more with this. Add my 20+ years of gaming experience to that. [/QUOTE]

Verification