Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/11/13 L&L: This week in D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 6087420" data-attributes="member: 6689464"><p>none taken, that is orthogonal to the point anyway. My point is, the Basic game cannot allow itself to be extremely rigid, it has to be simple to learn and start, no doubt, and devoid of additional complexity, but it has to be a complete game, that allows to play complete campaigns, be self-contained and result extremely flexible, without having to relly on extra products, in other words the basic game has to be THE D&D, a sefl contained box like that should be capable of being sold along other boardgames like Risk and Monopoly, finding its way back into the mainstream. but if it keeps being a hampered game, a pay-to-preview, it will face the issues the current red box has. </p><p></p><p>Of course there's still be a place for the standard and the advanced game, but those supplements are more targeted to existing players and those who eventually grow bored of the basic game, but if the basic game si solid, the rest of the stuff built arond it will have the chance to grow on it's own and eventually be revised and reedited for itself, just never in a way that invalidates the basic game. </p><p></p><p>I'm not askign for much, such a small change would mean zero extra complexity, but would add a lot of flexibility to the basic game, namely let each player to pick the favored ability for their characters regardless of class, they still can say the archetypal Fighters is good in STR stuff, the archetypal rogue with DEX stuff, the archetypal Wizard with INT and the Cleric with WIS, but your character can be different if you wish. Such a small concession could greatly expand the scope of the basic game, which in utrn would allow it to become a shared frame or refference for what D&D means. </p><p></p><p>Yes, the basic game means none extra stuff bolt on, but having zero choice risks turning it into a boardgame. Just allow players to choose their area of expertise, don't hard code it, it is a single extra line on the booklet, and a very minor compared witht the cleics and wizards that will still have to pick which spells to preppare each day.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 6087420, member: 6689464"] none taken, that is orthogonal to the point anyway. My point is, the Basic game cannot allow itself to be extremely rigid, it has to be simple to learn and start, no doubt, and devoid of additional complexity, but it has to be a complete game, that allows to play complete campaigns, be self-contained and result extremely flexible, without having to relly on extra products, in other words the basic game has to be THE D&D, a sefl contained box like that should be capable of being sold along other boardgames like Risk and Monopoly, finding its way back into the mainstream. but if it keeps being a hampered game, a pay-to-preview, it will face the issues the current red box has. Of course there's still be a place for the standard and the advanced game, but those supplements are more targeted to existing players and those who eventually grow bored of the basic game, but if the basic game si solid, the rest of the stuff built arond it will have the chance to grow on it's own and eventually be revised and reedited for itself, just never in a way that invalidates the basic game. I'm not askign for much, such a small change would mean zero extra complexity, but would add a lot of flexibility to the basic game, namely let each player to pick the favored ability for their characters regardless of class, they still can say the archetypal Fighters is good in STR stuff, the archetypal rogue with DEX stuff, the archetypal Wizard with INT and the Cleric with WIS, but your character can be different if you wish. Such a small concession could greatly expand the scope of the basic game, which in utrn would allow it to become a shared frame or refference for what D&D means. Yes, the basic game means none extra stuff bolt on, but having zero choice risks turning it into a boardgame. Just allow players to choose their area of expertise, don't hard code it, it is a single extra line on the booklet, and a very minor compared witht the cleics and wizards that will still have to pick which spells to preppare each day. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
2/11/13 L&L: This week in D&D
Top